I'm not a Creationist. I'm just not dimwitted enough to accept evolutionist theory as a scientific law. What is it with some of you? Not completely adhering to evolutionist theory somehow means I have to be a creationist?
Black/White
Night/Day...
Some of you should step out into the gray sometimes. It's good for the mind.
I didn't say that you were. Nor can I find any post on this thread where someone else said that you were. Are you feeling well?
I'm just not dimwitted enough to accept evolutionist theory as a scientific law.
Actually, it's quite apparent that you lack the knowledge to make an informed conclusion about it one way or the other. Part of your problem is that you have a clear confusion between "theory" and "law" in a scientific context. As another poster has accurately pointed out, they cover different classifications, and anyone who *did* accept any "theory as a scientific law" would be severely confused.
I repeat -- please *learn* something about how science works before you attempt to critique it.
What is it with some of you? Not completely adhering to evolutionist theory somehow means I have to be a creationist?
Not at all -- why do you hallucinate that we have done any such thing? I have reread all of the posts to you on this thread, and nowhere have I found where anyone presumed that you must be a creationist.
Please explain the source of your flawed reading comprehension. In short, "what is it with *you*?"
Black/White Night/Day...
Reading things in posts that aren't really there...
Some of you should step out into the gray sometimes. It's good for the mind.
If you think you can identify any time in this thread where I have made such an error, feel free to specifically point it out.
Until then, you're just flinging broad accusations, apparently for lack of anything more cogent to say on the subject.