To: Ichneumon
Please state, in your own words, the "evidentiary difficulties" you feel that National Geographic has failed to acknowledge. Broken down to its essence, the theory of evolution fails to address the monumental problem of turning rocks into people in a universe totally devoid of intelligence. Anyone who would believe that rocks could turn into people could be convinced of just about anything.
To: longshadow
Award-winning placemarker.
307 posted on
11/13/2004 6:43:00 PM PST by
PatrickHenry
(Theory: a comprehensible, falsifiable, cause-and-effect explanation of verifiable facts.)
To: Migraine
the theory of evolution fails to address the monumental problem of turning rocks into people in a universe totally devoid of intelligence. Anyone who would believe that rocks could turn into people could be convinced of just about anything.
Of course the theory of evolution fails to address turning rocks into people. That's because evolution doesn't predict that at all. Evolution has nothing to do with the creation of life - its only about already living creatures accumulating biological changes over time.
No where in the theory of evolution does it say that life sprung forth from rocks. In fact, the theory is totally silent on the subject of the origin of life. If you actually knew something about evolution you wouldn't post something like that.
To: Migraine
Anyone who would believe that rocks could turn into people could be convinced of just about anything. Anyone who would believe that the theory of Evolution says that rocks could turn into people could be convinced of just about anything. And obviously has.
356 posted on
11/14/2004 9:37:13 AM PST by
balrog666
(The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson