Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: R. Scott
You mean like THIS???
 

Scientific American publishes a six-page news story on nanotechnology in their April 1996 issue. The story is inaccurate and biased. From this six-page story, only two paragraphs are published on the Web by SciAm at this point.
 
(From HERE: http://www.foresight.org/SciAmDebate/SciAmOverview.html )

421 posted on 11/18/2004 4:13:42 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 420 | View Replies ]


To: Elsie
 

  John Rennie, Editor of SciAm says: "I am a  Journalistist; not a Scientist."
 
 
http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:OjIFI9SekZUJ:www.csfpittsburgh.org/sept03.pdf+%2215+Answers+to+Creationist+Nonsense%22&hl=en
 
 
(More fuel for the fire.............   ;^)

422 posted on 11/18/2004 4:27:49 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

To: Elsie

Thank God for the internet - we are no longer stuck with having only one or two sources.


423 posted on 11/19/2004 6:24:39 AM PST by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson