Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

By Their Words You Shall Know Them
Men's News Daily ^ | November 10, 2004 | Michael P. Tremoglie

Posted on 11/10/2004 11:43:58 AM PST by Miami Vice

I wrote an article titled Clueless Liberals in August 2003, the thesis of which was that liberals only talk to each other and therefore will remain ignorant. This ignorance will manifest itself by their inability to be elected.

During an interview about this column, with Felipe Luciano and Sam Greenfield of WWRL 1600 AM New York, I mentioned that Fox News’ success was a result of providing a service to a market that was not being served by the mainstream media. This is the same reason why the Republicans have been successful.

Two years ago I wrote an article explaining that there would be a tectonic shift in the politics in this country. It seemed to me that every sixty or so years the majority party of the country changes.

From the founding of the nation until the Civil War, the country vacillated between two developing political beliefs. However, beginning with the cataclysmic nation event of the Civil War, the Republican Party became the majority party, both in Congress and the White House. It remained so until the next cataclysmic national event - the Great Depression. Then the Democrats became the majority political party.

This remained true until the first election after the cataclysmic events of 9-11-01 when Republicans obtained a significant majority. Republicans began becoming the majority in 1994, when they achieved majority status of the House of Representatives after forty years in the wilderness. However, Bush was barely elected president in 2000 and there was a nominal majority in the Senate.

However, the first election since 9-11 resulted with Republicans becoming a significant majority.

However, the mainstream media and academic culture – the chattering classes – have not realized this. They continue to spout the same anti-American, anti-military, anti-patriotic, anti-religious, anti-Republican, and anti-conservative palaver that has been popular since the 1930’s.

They are dinosaurs. You will know them by the words they speak. Among them are:

Bill Maher, who once called American Air Force pilots cowards and the terrorists of 9-11 brave. "We have been the cowards lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away… That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly, ” Maher commented during a September 2001 edition of his show Politically Incorrect. Other Maher pearls of wisdom include stating during a Larry King interview that he considers religion superstition.

Phil Donahue, who said, “The [Catholic] Church has always thrived on ignorance and oppression." He also said during his old MSNBC show, with Vladimir Posner, that religion murdered more people than any other.

Journalist Eleanor Clift, who selected Saddam Hussein as the 1990 Person of the Year because he is, “a two-bit dictator who's got a superpower on the run."

Journalist Joe Conason who wrote that the reason President Bush wants to fund a voyage to Mars is that he is the tool of Halliburton, which wants to drill for oil on Mars.

Lani Guinier, former Clinton Attorney General nominee, now law professor, who said that the electoral college was founded to promote slavery. She wrote this in the December 4, 2000 edition of The Nation.

Katrina vanden Heuvel, the publisher of The Nation, who once said that President Bush was trying establish a theocracy. (N.B. this statement made a couple of years ago is now considered a legitimate observation since the election.)

Speaking of the election and theology, during a symposium about the 2004 election at Georgetown University, a student in the audience told the panel featuring E.J. Dionne, Jr., that while she was campaigning for Virginia Governor Warner she appealed to the “NASCAR Theocrats” of western Virginia by indicating that Governor Warner valued them. (NASCAR Theocrat? Warner values NASCAR Theocrats? What is a NASCAR Theocrat? Some churchgoing autoracing fan? With friends like Warner???)

Thomas Mann of the Brookings Institution who said during another symposium about the election that he liked Zell Miller’s Republican Convention speech, however, it “ was better in the original German. “

These distinguished American citizens: journalists, jurists, politicians, entertainers, academicians - all have as a common thread their disdain for American history, American culture, the Constitution, the United States military, religion, and capitalism.

They reveal the true nature of the liberal, educated elite who think that anyone:

who does not think that criminals should be rehabilitated instead of imprisoned who does not think that the global war against terrorism is a metaphor who does not believe that gays should be married who does not think the Bible is merely a collection of fairy tales who does not think the economy of our country should be controlled by a few brilliant government bureaucrats who does not think that people with impressive LSAT scores should determine the law who does not know what the Sundance Channel is who do not think Sex and the City is a good show who do not like Howard Stern ...is ignorant and bigoted and therefore should not be permitted full citizenship and definitely should not be allowed to vote.

The very same liberals who generally speak in reverential tones about helping the common person have a tremendous disdain for the common person. They are the vanguardists of Lenin – those who will lead the ignorant masses to the promised land.

However, the hoi polloi spoke during this last election. They told the chattering classes that they were not fooled by their propaganda. They were not duped by their promises.

They told the liberal educated elite that not only are they smarter than they think – they are smarter than the liberal educated elite.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: democrats; liberals; media

1 posted on 11/10/2004 11:44:01 AM PST by Miami Vice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Miami Vice
Journalist Joe Conason who wrote that the reason President Bush wants to fund a voyage to Mars is that he is the tool of Halliburton, which wants to drill for oil on Mars.

"... yes... YESSSSSS... it all makes perfect sense, now -- !" :)

2 posted on 11/10/2004 11:50:14 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

It's really because he plans to ship all the Dems. and Libs. to the 'RED" planet, to try to balance it out with some blue area's, and have it resemble the map of the Bush supporting area's of the Country, Even Martians support Bush. They don't call it the "Red" planet for nothing.


3 posted on 11/10/2004 9:33:15 PM PST by diss-a-lib (God is a comedian, with an audience that refuses to laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson