Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL
“Eventually the money was divided up”, one official noted. “Agreements were signed. The Palestinian leaders understood that in order to put their hands on the fortune and get rid of Suha, they would be better off paying her handsomely”.

I'm not sure why it wouldn't have been better for the Palestinians to have paid her nothing at all. Unless, of course, she could have blackmailed some of their leaders...

2 posted on 11/12/2004 9:29:46 PM PST by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: independentmind; SmithL

> ... why it wouldn't have been better for the
> Palestinians to have paid her nothing at all.

“But you must sign an agreement and reveal all of
your husband’s bank accounts and investments,
and enable the transfer of the funds ..."

Apart from having control of the money (and the body,
and the official cause of death), she also knows all
about Yasser's personal preversions, and might have
threatened to "out" him posthumously.


8 posted on 11/12/2004 10:08:53 PM PST by Boundless (but I'm sure that "taking care of" Suha is on the Hamas "to do" list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: independentmind

She had control over the plugs to Arafat's machines. If they didn't make a deal, she would claim Arafat is alive, and they would not get to move quickly into power. She even had a couple of clerics come and claim they spoke to Arafat and to unplug him would be a sin. For the Palestinian leaders, the best deal was to pay her off quickly to pull the plug and let him die. Waiting too long meant uncertainty and unrest which threatened everything they had already stolen.


13 posted on 11/13/2004 12:34:17 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson