Replies

http://www.stopcovertwar.com/enter.html
General Information

The information at this web site has taken several years to accumulate. When we first noticed the stalking/harassment problem, there was no where to go to find this information, we simply had to learn it the hard way. Many of us here believe if we had access to this information when we first noticed something was wrong, we would have been saved a lot of time, grief, and money.

Information we have gathered so far indicates there are thousands of victims of Covert War. We are starting a support group for the folks who want to exchange information or just make contact with other Targets of Covert War. We will pass on what information we can. We hope your calls will help us add to the data we have in order to gather more details of the methods and equipment used to torment Targeted individuals. Please read the following carefully:

(1.) Some mail we have attempted to send or receive on the subject of Covert War has been intercepted, never to reach its destination. This includes both e-mail and Post Office mail. Therefore, it is necessary for anyone wishing to contact us to call in order to confirm any mail sent to us. We, in turn, will contact by phone or publish on our web site the ALIAS name of anyone contacting us so that mail delivery to and from us can be confirmed. We are sorry that our budget does not allow us to accept collect calls at this time. Again, for your safety and privacy, use an alias name.

(2.) If you e-mail us and you do not receive an answer within 48 hours, you may call 512-255-1587 or 512-255-0993 Keep Trying even from different phones! You do not have to convince us you are a Target of Covert War. Just tell us the methods used and what region of the country. We suggest you not stay on the phone longer than two minutes as our phone line is tapped. Again, use an alias name.

3.) We will publish the time and date of each call we receive. If you talk to us and do not see your phone call logged on the phone page, we did not receive it! Your did not talk to us! We are logging
calls because the government has the capability to intercept telephone calls.
Check the call log.

In addition:

The government is shutting down web sites that inform the public about Covert War. Just try to access saveamerica.com, which was up and running in February, 2000. Only one month later, in March, 2000, saveamerica.com cannot be accessed and the phone number that was working at that time has been changed to an unlisted number. The secretary who answered the phone in February was very sympathetic but sounded as though she was not able to speak freely. She did say that she had been swamped with calls from all over the United States, reporting the Covert War described herein. Again, we will never voluntarily abandon this web site or phone number. If you are unable to contact us, keep trying. If, after continued attempts, you cannot make contact, read our home page again and keep trying.

NOTE: There has been an increase in marches, rallies, and protests. Having
interfaced with several groups organizing for change, a strange phenomena has been noted. It seems these organizations are having problems getting their e-mail on time. Members miss meetings and marches because the information arrived a day late! Seems the e-mail is being some how delayed. Any group
organizing for change can expect late e-mail. Do not rely on e-mail. Go back to telephone numbers.
E-mail is useful for mailing brochures, flyers, banners, etc. All marches and meetings should be announced by phone or there will be people who never get the word on time. Of course, infiltrators will get the word on time.

Recommended reading:

Dr. Noa Davenport, "Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace"
" having this book in hand can be a great way for gang stalking targets to begin the
process of educating one's friends and family as to the reality of this seemingly 'taboo'
side of contemporary human behaviour." --Eleanor White full review, click here.

David Lawson, "Terrorist Stalking in America" Targeted individuals are
stalked for years by extremist groups who engage in stalking those whom
they consider unfit to survive. For a full book review, click here.

Brian Glick, "The War at Home" $5.00 Everything you need to know
about how the Government is going to infiltrate and mess up your
organization.

H. Michael Sweeney, "The Professional Paranoid" Michael's report on his
experience with the illegal activities of government agencies. Advice to the
reality based paranoid. For a full book review, click here.

Carol Rutz, "A Nation Betrayed" Describes brutal atrocities performed on
American children by our government. From Fidelity Publishing, P.O. Box
365, Grass Lake, MI 49240-0365 For a full book review, click here.

David Morehouse, "Psychic Warrior" Tells of his involvement in secret government remote viewing programs and his subsequent retirement from the military. In spite of government's public debunking of psychic powers, the program started in the 1970's and still continues today.

John Marks, "Search for the Manchurian Candidate" Documents, based on 16,000
pages of Freedom of Information material and personal interviews of the perpetrators and victims, the CIA's MKULTRA program. MKULTRA was the beginning of what is today the Covert War against citizens by thoroughly corrupt elements of government and the elite.
For a full book review, click here.

"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better
than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask
not your counsel or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands of those
who feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you. May posterity forget
that ye were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams

Return to Headline page.
Return to Information page
Austin Activist: CALENDAR of Events
Find out if you are a Target of Covert War.
Counter measures...Reports from Covert War Survivors! (UPDATED)
ACTIVISTS: DOWNLOAD FLYERS HERE!
AND WEAR THE TEE TO FIND OTHER VICTIMS!
*SUPPORT-ACTIVIST GROUP MEETINGS*
NETWORKING PAGE: REPORT CRIMES HERE! (UPDATED)
About Your Contributions...
Find out about the Perpetrators.
Check out the DEW! Are you a Target of these new age weapons?
Can DEW, Taos hum be detected or shielded? Ongoing experiments!
Are you bugged? Simple tests you can do!
Find out more! Go to the announcements/links page.
A Word to friends and Family!
Are you BLACKLISTED?
The War Against Whistleblowers
The War Against The Rich
The War Against Children
The War Against Patriots
The War Against Gays and Lesbians
The War Against The Working Class
The War Against Married People
The War Against The Homeless (NEW)
Texas.net denies service without notice or cause!
Find out about Cointelpro!
Non-Believers Read About H.R. 2977
Find out why it makes no difference who we have as president!
Defend the Constitution! Oppose the USA Patriot Act!
Find out how your votes are being STOLEN!
Executive order...Potential for abuse.
Check the call log.
Read all about "The Ongoing Saga of Freida Flag"
Read Freida Flag's "I Told You So!"
The McVeigh Scandal--Some questions to be answered.
Advanced technology EXPOSED: Books and Videos
Missing Persons
More corruption revealed

StopCovertWar
Box 607
Round Rock, TX 78680
512-255-1587

Return to HOME

Click here for free search engine registry!

Click here to go to the free meta tag analyzer!

If there is a problem with the website
email packrat@650dialup.com or
call our webmaster 512-255-0993
Page last updated 01-31-04

Go To Replies

Sympatico / MSN Groups Sponsored Links

World News in the Financial Times
Try 4 weeks risk-free home delivery of the FT and get World news and more. If you like it, subscribe for just $99 for one year (306 issues) - a savings... www.ftnewspaper.com

World News Topics: The New York Times
The New York Times online edition. Local, national and international news from the winner of 90 Pulitzer Prizes. One week free trial and only $12.50 for... www.nytimesee.com

Today's Newspapers
Digital replicas of 160 newspapers from 40 countries around the world. Available before they appear on the newsstands. www.pressdisplay.com

First Previous 2 of 2 Next Last Delete Replies

Reply
Recommend Delete Message 2 of 2 in Discussion

From: copernicus12223 Sent: 07/03/2005 2:00 PM
http://www.raven1.net/
** THIS COVER PAGE IS HEAVY ON GRAPHICS. RECOMMEND IMAGE AUTO LOAD OFF **
Appropriate theme music (click to listen): Battle Hymn of the Republic

Last updated: March 3, 2005

Would wearing a tricornered hat be a way to protest the large scale international crimes happening these days? A way to silently remind others that we long to return to early Constitutional principles? A way to locate others who have the same concerns? A way to spark conversations on the really important issues? A method of protest the media could not cover up?

Freedom Isn't Free, and Silence is Consent!
Make no mistake about it: The fact that gang stalking and electronic harassment has become common, and is NOT prosecuted by the justice system of any country, means that constitutional rule of law is DEAD. When citizens can be targeted for years and DECADES without law enforcement acting to stop the crimes, you have no rule of law, you have the rule of the jungle.
What you are going to read on this site may not seem real to the unaware public. There are three statistics, two from official professional sources, which support what we are asserting here:

** A survey like the one on this site was posted on a high volume news site in 2002. 12,000 people visited that survey in 24 hours. About 120 sent in responses saying they had most or all of the symptoms of gang stalking with electronic harassment. That is 1 person in a hundred, primarily in North America.
** Statistics from the book Mobbing: Emotional Abuse in the American Workplace show that in Sweden, about 3.5% of the working population is subject to mobbing, which is gang stalking in the workplace. 3.5% of working people is roughly 1 person in a hundred total, and is in line with the gang stalking survey above.

** Statistics from the British (government) Home Office state that 990,000 people in the United Kingdom are victims of stalking or harassment at any one time as of the year 2000. That is about 1.4 people per hundred. Here again, the gang stalking survey's 1 person in a hundred is not out of line. This information was posted on the cover page of a British international detective and security agency at this link in January 2005.

So when we discuss gang stalking with electronic harassment here, please keep in mind that this is a real issue, not some psychopathic ranting. One question which deserves to be asked of government and the media repeatedly is: Why is this being hushed up?

Daily, unexplainable harassment. Break-ins at home, work, and car. Thefts and sabotage just below a cost where police will act. Vicious, well organized rumour campaigns. Destruction of reputation, career, and relationships. Unusual medical symptoms for which doctors find no cause. Well organized, very cleverly engineered 24/7 harassment by vigilante-style stalking gangs, activities of which are ignored and denied by all levels of government.
Electronically induced sleep deprivation and PAIN.

This web site is about one type of the ongoing (and vigorously denied) government ignored or backed crimes, historically carried on by non- government entities for cover, examples of which started in the 1950s as MKULTRA, and COINTELPRO. The code names were dropped, but the activity never stopped. The crime documented here is a literal covert war on citizens. This covert war operates like a cross between citizen vigilante style "criminal rehabilitation groups" and "contract revenge services" for the rich and powerful.

Our targeted people have had great difficulty finding out who is behind this harassment. On very rare occasions, one of our members will find a revealing piece of information. One such revelation comes from a member who has a seniour police officer as a personal friend. This police officer (on condition of anonymity) revealed that many police departments tacitly encourage the activity of these citizen vigilante groups because they "keep criminals in line."

The anonymous police officer said police recognize that innocent people will sometimes be targeted too, but some police departments consider that an acceptable price to pay for crime control.

Dean, I still haven't got through all your info. I decided to send you the Claim & Counter Claim now anyway, use it as you see fit. This will be the first and I'll just number the others if I need more than one. 2005 01 T 0010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRAIL DIVISION BETWEEN: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT STATEMENT OF CLAIM The Plaintiff is a resident of Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, and a Member of the 38th Parliament of Canada representing the constituency of Random-Burin-St. George’s. The Defendant is a resident of Long Pond, Conception Bay South, and at all material times hereto has created and submitted written material to be posted on the following web site: (the "Site"). On or about 25 October 2004, the Plaintiff learned that the Defendant had published or caused to be published, inter alia, the following words on the Site: ...Liberal MP Bill Matthews & his friend, raped the same child repeatedly for than 3 Yrs. At 14, she had a second baby, Aaron, she said she was 80% sure he is Matthews son. A third baby, Harriett, at 18 & 3 miscarriages also, by this time, what abuse of a child. 2 On the Site, the Plaintiff learned that the Defendant published or caused to be published the following words: To whom it may concern: July 24, 2001 My name is Byron Prior. I’m the oldest living of these 12 children. I not only had to live through my abuse but, watch as the rest of my sisters and brother were abused and raped. Three of my sisters raped ... a second raped ... at age 12 $ Bill Matthews & friends from 13 on. ... The legal system are only concerned with keeping all this under cover and protect themselves. ... I have copies of my full statement on all the details of what happened, which I gave the R.C.M.P. on March 9, 1998, 52.5 hours at their office. I will send it to anyone who will send my a E-mail address. I will never forget the abuse, shame, and persecution to this day, from the animals who did this to my family. Sincerely, Byron Prior The Plaintiff says that the Defendant also sent electronic mail messages to persons making the allegations referenced in the preceding two paragraphs and inviting those persons to access the Site. The Plaintiff says that the Defendant’s electronic mail messages inviting persons to access the Site and the publication of the words in the two preceding paragraphs were sent and published respectively with the intent that the allegations against the Plaintiff receive wide circulation. The Plaintiff says that the allegations made against him in the Site are false and that have been published by the Defendant to cause persons receiving his electronic mail messages or accessing the Site to hate and despise him. The Plaintiff says that the words that the Plaintiff has used in his electronic mail messages and the Site have 3 caused him embarrassment and required him to defend his reputation. The Plaintiff says that he has suffered damages as a result of the Defendant’s publication of his allegations. The Plaintiff says that he demanded, through correspondence written and delivered to the Defendant on his behalf, that the Defendant cease the publication of the statements referenced in paragraphs 3 and 4 herein. The Plaintiff says that the Defendant has ignored the demand and continues to publish the words on the Site. The Plaintiff therefore claims: general damages to be assessed; aggravated, exemplary and/or punitive damages; an injunction prohibiting the Defendant from publishing the words contained in this Statement of Claim or words having the same defamatory meaning against the Plaintiff through any site on the world wide web or through any other medium; pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to the provisions of the Judgment Interest Act, R.S.N. 1990, c. J-2; cost on a solicitor and own client basis; such further relief deems to be equitable and just in the circumstances. 4 DATED at St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this 31st day of December, 2004. Stephen J. May PATTERSON PALMER Suite 1000, Scotia Centre 235 Water Street P.O. Box 610 St. John’s, NL A1C 5L3 Solicitors for the Plaintiff TO: Byron Prior Reader Hill Road Long Pond, NL A0A 3Y0 The Defendant ISSUED at St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this 4th day of January, 2005. --------------------------------------- 14370 0001 Statement of Claim 2004 01 T IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRAIL DIVISION BETWEEN: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT NOTICE TO DEFENDANT You are hereby notified that the Plaintiff may enter judgment in accordance with the Statement of Claim or such Order as, according to the practice of the Court, the Plaintiff is entitled to, without any further notice to you unless with ten (10) days, after service hereof upon you, you cause to be filed in the Registry of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland at St. John’s a Defence and unless within the same time a copy of your Defence is served upon the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff’s solicitors at the Plaintiff’s solicitor’s address for service. Provided that if the claim is for a debt or other liquidated demand and you pay the amount claimed in the statement of Claim and sum of $ for costs to the Plaintiff or the Plaintiff’s solicitors within then (10) days from the service of this notice upon you, then this proceeding will be stayed. TO: Byron Prior Reader Hill Road Long Pond, NL A0A 3Y0 The Defendant 2005 01 T 0010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRAIL DIVISION BETWEEN WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF and BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT AND BETWEEN BYRON PRIOR PLAINTIFF and WILLIAM MATTHEWS T. ALEX HICKMAN THOMAS MARSHALL DANNY WILLIAMS EDWARD M. ROBERTS COUNTERCLAIM 1. The Plaintiff, Byron Prior was born and raised in Grand Bank Newfoundland. He is an out of work former employee of the offshore oil exploration industry who is now on social assistance. He has been unable to find employment in the area of his expertise because his outspokenness in the 1980’s about oil industry matters that caused Crosbie Offshore Services to be investigated for its wrongful acts. The aforesaid company was then controlled by Andrew Crosbie, brother to John Crosbie a former Minister of Justice of Canada. 2. The Defendant, Edward M. Roberts was once a member of the law firm of Patterson Palmer who acted against the Plaintiff years ago on behalf of the Defendant William Matthews. He knew the truth of the plaintiffs allegations and did nothing to up hold the law in the pursuit of his own gain. On September 8th, 2004, the Plaintiff made personal service upon Edward Roberts as the Leutenant Governor of Newfoundland Hard irrefutable evidence proving the crimes that concern his friend David Amos on the same day that Amos was having a lawyer file the same documents attached to his affidavit in defence of a friend unjustly charged with criminal behavior in a New Brunswick Provincial Court in Sussex NB. Roberts continued to stay the course of his deceit and merely passed the evidence on the Defendant, to Thomas Marshall the Attorney General of Newfoundland and Labrador who has done nothing whatsoever to uphold the law. Marshall has refused to answer or return one phone call or email in order answer or ask one question about the allegations of crime by the plaintiff and his friend Amos. 3 The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, William Matthews was born and raised in Grand Bank Newfoundland. on July 22, 1947. He attended Memorial University and in 1969 he earned a B.P.E., B.Ed. He was first elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature in 1982 as the MHA for the Grand Bank District. He was re-elected in 1985 and was appointed Minister of Culture, Recreation and Youth. In 1988, Mr. Matthews was appointed Minister of Career Development & Advanced Studies. In 1989, Mr. Matthews was re-elected to the Newfoundland and Labrador Legislature and was appointed Finance Critic. From 1990 to 1995, he served as Fisheries Critic, and in 1991 was appointed as Opposition House Leader. In 1993, Mr. Matthews was again elected to the Legislature and was re-appointed House Leader and Fisheries Critic. On June 2, 1997, he was elected as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St.George’s. the Defendant did serve as Vice-Chair of the Standing Committees on Fisheries & Oceans. On Sept 1st, 2000, he was appointed Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The defendant was re-elected November 27, 2000 as the Member of Parliament for Burin-St. George’s and re-appointed September 1, 2001 as the Parliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs. The Defendant was reelected on June 28th, 2005 but is now a backbencher in the Liberal caucus of the 38th Parliament of Canada still representing the constituency of Random-Burin-St. George’s having apparently fallen out of favor with Paul Martin’s minority government. 4 The Plaintiff further states he has no doubt that his actions are part of the reason for the Defendant’s loss of Stature within the Liberal Caucus and the cause of his stated embarrassment in paragraph number six (6) of his statement of claim. 5 The Plaintiff further states the Defendant, T. Alex Hickman was born and raised in Grand Bank Newfoundland. The Plaintiff whose mother was a whore with Hickman as a client has known him since childhood. The Plaintiff witnessed the fact that Hickman sexual abused his younger sibling at 12 years old on the day of his first political win in 1966. Hickman and his associate John Crosbie rose to positions of great power and wealth beginning under the corrupt leadership of Joey Smallwood before turning coat on the Liberal party and climbing even higher on the political totem pole of Public Corruption. Hickman finally retired as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and was later awarded the Order of Canada with the courthouse in Grand Bank now bearing his wicked name. 6. The Plaintiff has never made any secret of the fact that he hated and despised the Defendants Matthews and Hickman ever since he was a child chucking rocks in the street at Matthews’ big green fifties Chrysler as he sped away to sexually abuse another one of the Plaintiff’s underage siblings. Both the Plaintiff and Matthews knew that he would never be punished because of what everybody in Grand Bank new of the sexual misdeeds of Hickman. The Plaintiff is grateful for the invention of the World Wide Web in his lifetime in order that he may tell all who wish to read of it what he knows to be true in Newfoundland. Now the Plaintiff can hurl simple truths far and wide at the defendants on the Internet highway. He will not stop telling the world the truth because the defendant, William Matthews feels embarrassed and justifiably hated and despised by many others. The Plaintiff is proud of his work legally published in another country so that the crooks in his home Province of Newfoundland can no longer keep their dirty secrets to themselves. 7. Plaintiff was denied legal aid in this matter by the government lawyer, John Duggan for no stated reason that the Plaintiff can find within the Legal Aid Act. However the Plaintiff is well aware that he will never receive any assistance from law enforcement or the judicial system because of the cover up of the sexual abuse of his family when he was a child by T. Alex Hickman, the former Minister of Justice and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador. 8. The Plaintiff further states that when his friend Amos heard that the Province was unwilling to offer legal aid to him or even look at the supporting evidence from Amos they knew for certain all government employees in Newfoundland were acting against the Plaintiff under orders from the Premier Danny Williams. Amos did the best he could to help compose the Plaintiff’s answer and counterclaim within the time allowed by the rules of this court. 9. The Plaintiff further states that Amos also went one step further to make certain their suspicion of the malice of Danny Williams was true. On January 20th, 2005, Amos called Danny Williams’ office personally and asked why he had not responded to the identical letter and materials Roberts, Crosbie and the Newfoundland Law Society had received. The Plaintiff had served it upon his office on September 9th and the receipt is signed by one of his assistants. The aforesaid material also included a copy of a police surveillance tape numbered 139 recorded in the USA of the mob. This letter certainly warranted a valid answer for someone in law enforcement. However later in the day another one of Danny Williams’ assistants called Amos back and denied any knowledge of anything. That man’s words affirmed what the plaintiff and his friend already knew and that is almost everyone employed within the justice system is willing to be a liar and support Public Corruption for their own personal gain. People employed in the Public Service of law enforcement only act ethically and do their job if it’s politically correct to do so in order to keep their job. It truly is just that simple and everybody knows it. The plaintiff and his friend merely went to great lengths to prove it after the Justice Systems of two countries had practiced many crimes against each of them. 10.The true facts of this matter are stated as best the Plaintiff could in his answer to William Matthews now a defendant in this Counterclaim. For the sake of brevity for the court, the benefit of the Plaintiff and the Public Trust, the Plaintiff, Byron prays the court to review his answer filed at the same time as this counterclaim in a timely fashion as per the rules of this court. 11.The Plaintiff is now prepared to reveal all that he knows to be true about wrongful actions within the offshore oil exploration industry and to be a supporting witness to the allegations of much Public Corruption within Canada and the United States of America (USA) recently exposed by Amos. The Plaintiff truly believes that is the reason he was served the malicious claim against him by William Matthews at this time and compelled to answer it on or by January 21st, 2005 is because of the actions of Amos in the USA and his court ordered appearance in Dorchester District Court in Boston Massachusetts on the very same day. All of the above named defendants are involved in a cross border conspiracy to cover-up many crimes. 12.The Plaintiff further states that he and his friend are well aware that their knowledge and evidence of many crimes are a very serious and a legitimate threat to the false integrity of many persons employed to protect the Public Interests of the people around the world. They have no doubt whatsoever that their lives are in great danger. History has proven many decent men acting as they have died for much less. However history has also proven that if good men do nothing evil will prevail. The Plaintiff and his friend have no choice but to proceed in their efforts to expose Public Corruption because it is not in their nature to quit. They also recognize the fact that as fathers they owe to their children what their forefathers fought so hard in so many wars to secure for them, Freedom within a Just Democracy. 13.The Plaintiff further states that the sincere actions of he and his friend to make what they know of many crimes become common knowledge has the entire corrupt Justice Systems of Canada and the USA greatly concerned. If the two friends do prevail in revealing the truth to all it will be to the detriment of many malevolent Global Corporations, Bankers, Politicians, lawyers and the most importantly the Catholic Church. There has been much ado in recent times about the affiliations within such societies as Skull and Bones and the involvement of Presidents and Senators who attempt to appear to be on the opposite side of the political fence. Politicians come and go every four years or so. However it is the puppet master that pulls the strings who always remains behind the scene that is the one who is truly obscene. The Plaintiff, Byron David Prior and his friend David Raymond Amos want the world to know they truly believe their most evil foe is none other than Count Peter-Hans Kolvenbach the Superior General of the Jesuits. 14.The Plaintiff therefore claims: a. general damages to be assessedb. aggravated, exemplary and/or punitive damages; pre-judgment and post-judgment interest pursuant to the provisions of the Judgment Interest Act, R.S.N. 1990, c. J-2; d. cost on a solicitor if one is found and own client basis; e. such further relief deems to be equitable and just in the circumstances. DATED at Conception Bay South Newfoundland and Labrador this 21st day of January, 2005. Byron Prior Reader’s Crescent, Conception Bay South, NL A1W 5B4 The Plaintiff TO: William Matthews C/o Stephen J. May PATTERSON PALMER Suite 1000, Scotia Centre 235 Water Street P.O. Box 610 St. John’s, NL. A1C 5L3 Solicitors for the defendant. TO: T. Alex Hickman 62 Carpasian Road St. John’s, NL A1B 2R4 Defendant TO: Thomas Marshall Department of Justice 4th Flr., East Block, Confederation Building Box 8700 St. John's, NL A1B 4J6 Defendant TO: Danny Williams Confederation Building St. John's, NL A1B 4J6 Defendant TO: Edward M. Roberts Government House Military Road St. John's, NL A1C 5W4 Defendant ISSUED at St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador this _______ day of January, 2005 Seal of the Court. 2005 01 T 0010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: WILLIAM MATTHEWS PLAINTIFF AND: BYRON PRIOR DEFENDANT AND BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR PLAINTIFF AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS T. ALEX HICKMAN THOMAS MARSHALL DANNY WILLIAMS EDWARD M. ROBERTS DEFENDANTS Notice to Defendants Counterclaim You are hereby notified that the plaintiff may enter judgment in accordance with the counterclaim or such order as, according to the practice of the Court, the plaintiff is entitled to, without any further notice to you unless within ten (10) days after service hereof upon you, you cause to be filed in the Registry of the Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador a defence to the counterclaim and unless within the same time a copy of your defence to the counterclaim is served upon the plaintiff at the plaintiff's stated address for service. If the counterclaim is for a debt or other liquidated demand and you pay the amount claimed in the counterclaim and the sum of $(or such sum as may be allowed on taxation) for costs to the plaintiff within ten (10) days from the service of this notice upon you, then this proceeding will be stayed. Endorsements RECEIVED on ___________ the _______ day of _______, 19_____. This counterclaim and attached notice to defendant(s) (counterclaim) was served by me on the defendant(s) (counterclaim), at _______________, on ___________ the _______ day of _______, 19_____, at approximately _____.m. Endorsed on __________ the _______ day of _______, 19_____. (Sgd.) (address) Affidavit of Service 2005 01 T 0010 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR TRIAL DIVISION BETWEEN: BYRON PRIOR PLAINTIFF AND: WILLIAM MATTHEWS DEFENDANT I, Byron Prior of Reader’s Hill Crescent, Conception Bay South, NL A1W 5B4 Newfoundland and Labrador, make oath (or affirm) and say that I did on , the day of January, 2005 at approximately _____.m., serve ______________, with the within counterclaim by leaving a true copy of the same with _____________ personally at ______________, and that I endorsed the date of service thereon on ______________ the _______ day of _______, 19_____. SWORN (OR AFFIRMED) to at _______________ in the Province