Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Launches Unmanned Hypersonic Jet
AP News ^ | November 16, 2004 | AP

Posted on 11/16/2004 3:28:29 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker

LOS ANGELES (AP) - An unmanned NASA jet was launched over the Pacific Ocean on Tuesday in a bid to demonstrate a radical new engine technology by flying at a world-record 7,000 mph - almost 10 times the speed of sound.

The 12-foot-long X-43A "scramjet" was carried aloft under the wing of a B-52 aircraft and released over a test range off the Southern California coast. It was to fly under its own power at Mach 10 for about 10 seconds at 110,000 feet, then glide to a splash landing. The craft was designed to sink and will not be recovered.

Unlike rockets, scramjets do not have to carry heavy oxidizer necessary to burn fuel. Instead, they can scoop oxygen out of the atmosphere.

Scramjet technology could be used to develop hypersonic missiles and airplanes or reusable space launch vehicles, with a potential for speeds of at least Mach 15.

The first X-43A flight failed in 2001 when the booster rocket veered off course and had to be destroyed. The second X-43A flew in March and reached Mach 6.83, or nearly 5,000 mph, a record for an aircraft powered by an air-breathing engine.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 7000mph; hypersonic; jet; nasa; scramjet; x43a
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

1 posted on 11/16/2004 3:28:29 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Did it work?

[looks like a hypodermic missile]

2 posted on 11/16/2004 3:32:33 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
We should have flown it at treetop level over Tehran. Let the weird beards know we've got something new in our holster.


3 posted on 11/16/2004 3:33:03 PM PST by Viking2002 (Taglines? Vikings don't need no steenkin' taglines..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dasboot
Did it work?

Worked great! :-)

4 posted on 11/16/2004 3:34:00 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dasboot

"Did it work?"

I was wondering that myself. The story indicates that it was launched but doesn't say anything about success.


5 posted on 11/16/2004 3:34:27 PM PST by cripplecreek (I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
It worked.

NASA's X-43A Scramjet Breaks Speed Record

NASA's X-43A research vehicle screamed into the record books today, demonstrating an air-breathing engine can fly at nearly 10 times the speed of sound. Preliminary data from the scramjet-powered research vehicle show its revolutionary engine worked successfully at approximately Mach 10, nearly 7000 mph, as it flew at an altitude of approximately 110,000 feet.

"This flight is a key milestone and a major step toward the future possibilities for producing boosters for sending large and critical payloads into space in a reliable, safe, inexpensive manner," said NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe. "These developments will also help us advance the Vision for Space Exploration, while helping to advance commercial aviation technology," Administrator O'Keefe said.

6 posted on 11/16/2004 3:35:52 PM PST by milestogo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Topped mach 9. :-)


7 posted on 11/16/2004 3:36:00 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
X-43A NASA Goes Hypersonic

NASA's X-43A research vehicle screamed into the record books today, demonstrating an air-breathing engine can fly at nearly 10 times the speed of sound. Preliminary data from the scramjet-powered research vehicle show its revolutionary engine worked successfully at approximately Mach 10, nearly 7000 mph, as it flew at an altitude of approximately 110,000 feet.

"This flight is a key milestone and a major step toward the future possibilities for producing boosters for sending large and critical payloads into space in a reliable, safe, inexpensive manner," said NASA Administrator Sean O'Keefe. "These developments will also help us advance the Vision for Space Exploration, while helping to advance commercial aviation technology," Administrator O'Keefe said.

8 posted on 11/16/2004 3:36:01 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

Oh big deal! The EU has a probe landing on the month that only took 13 months to get there (an earth moon, not Mars).


9 posted on 11/16/2004 3:36:36 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
Great. Some private guys just made it to space in a hang glider and NASA wants to demonstrate their competence by shooting missiles into the ocean. Send them another $100 billion!
10 posted on 11/16/2004 3:37:12 PM PST by Jaysun (Wal-Mart is wonderful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson

I hope that moon probe takes some pics of the dark side of the moon.


11 posted on 11/16/2004 3:38:14 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ...... The War on Terrorism is the ultimate 'faith-based' initiative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Mach 9; Shmock 9. What did the stewardesses look like?


12 posted on 11/16/2004 3:44:24 PM PST by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
You don't care to see your tax dollars spent on innovations in aerospace technology? You'd prefer some other nation to take the lead? Perhaps we should defer to France or the U.K.? Or maybe encourage the U.N. to take over our space program? We'll continue to fund it, just let them run things.

It means something to be a leader and sometimes we have to spend tax dollars on something bigger than ourselves instead of just making improvments on your comfort zone.

13 posted on 11/16/2004 3:44:38 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

That thing looks like a mock-up.


14 posted on 11/16/2004 3:46:36 PM PST by PeterFinn ("Tolerance" means WE have to tolerate THEM, they can hate us all they want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
The 12-foot-long X-43A "scramjet"

GI Joe is the pilot?

15 posted on 11/16/2004 3:48:16 PM PST by chemicalman (Finally an answer for the prisoner problem at Abu Ghraib: Don't take any.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

LMAO - stop! My side hurts I'm laughing so hard!


16 posted on 11/16/2004 3:48:21 PM PST by jazztrptman (Bremer was the problem, not the lack of troops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PeterFinn

this was a test platform, only 3.7m long.

SMOKIN'


17 posted on 11/16/2004 3:48:48 PM PST by mondoman (si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: chemicalman

You can't read, can you?


18 posted on 11/16/2004 3:48:58 PM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
I think this is the technology that will allow us to deliver payloads of nastiness 1/3 the way around the globe on two hours' notice; and upgrade anti-missile defenses.

Good deterrent.

19 posted on 11/16/2004 3:53:44 PM PST by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker
The craft was designed to sink...

I have this brick that was designed to sink, too.
20 posted on 11/16/2004 3:57:12 PM PST by BJClinton (And your crybaby whiny-assed opinion would be ....?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson