[IrishBrewer]

Even if his thesis is true, a alternative hypothesis could also be responsible. Electronic voting machines are more resistant to traditional fraud, therefore democrat vote fraud is suppressed

I had the same thought. Many of the counties mentioned (such as Broward) have Democratically controlled election boards. If there was fraud, it happened under the direct control of the Democrats. My feeling is that there wasn't and that the new machines gave a better accounting of the votes in counties where the accuracy wasn't so good in the past. It is very telling that the liberal Berkley professors don't even consider this as a possibility (at least they don't mention it as being a plausible explanation in their paper).

[MediaMole]

This isn't the first time lefties have made this charge. They made the same charge when Chambliss won the Georgia senate race in 2002. Some urban districts that had gone to electronic machines had a higher than expected vote for the GOP.

Here's an example...

[Holicheese]

I really hop ethat they keep pushing these theories. They didn't lose because their candidates are North East Leberal Elite snobs that can not connect with the average person. They didn't lose because they are aligning themselves with kooks and anti-american freaks. They lost because W rigged the electronic voting machines in Florida!!!