I agree on the dilution factor. I can personally attest that it has happened to a small degree already. Recruits are bought by the lure of college money and student loan repayments. I was out for a few years, then shortly a reservist. Predominantly, the kids were in it for the college money, but not paid enough for this or that task. Many were shocked that they would be required to go to war.
We should limit our recruitment as it is.
As for myself, I would be willing to do a short term contract in a war zone. No long term commitment. Even at 36 I am certain I could be an asset.
I think there are others like me, short term personnel. Temps. Give me a nine month tour with no strings attached, I would go in a NY minute. Of course, I would like the option of being attached to a Marine unit. I am former Special Ops so whats not to love.
I understand what your saying about the college fund money. Also you are probably familiar with Clinton's "New Army". Stress cards to hold up in basic training and that sort of nonsense. Starting precisely in 1993 I noticed a horrible difference in the attitudes of privates reporting to their first permanent duty station.
Enough of that talk, it's depressing what he did to the military. I just hope alot of that nonsense stopped once Bush took office.