Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: b4its2late
"Compared to counties with paper ballots, counties with electronic voting machines were significantly more likely to show increases in support for President Bush between 2000 (election) and 2004," the study said.
. . . suggesting that the measurement in the electronic system in 2004 overstated the Bush vote or that the measurement in the paper ballot system in 2000 understated the Bush vote.

Given that the issue arises in a county in which the Election Officials are Democrats . . .


17 posted on 11/22/2004 10:58:10 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: conservatism_IS_compassion

Again, have both dem and republican judges look at the paper receipts as the votes are being tabulated on a computer. And we should have strong networks to raise hell if they try to cheat.

I don't care if it's in the middle of Detroit, if we've got judges watching every vote and counting them as they go along, we'll be fine. Especially if we have paper receipts.

Then we won't have to speculate. We can come up with paper receipts for ATMs, surely we can do it for our democracy.


21 posted on 11/22/2004 11:05:40 AM PST by chitownfreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson