To: sinkspur
He was right about the dot com bust and he was right about the gutting of America's smoke stake industries, when he switched position on the topic back in the early to mid-90s.
14 posted on
11/23/2004 5:20:12 PM PST by
durasell
(Friends are so alarming, My lover's never charming...)
To: durasell
I take back my previous post...
Jan 2000:
Stephen Roach:
The forces behind the slower growth -- higher energy prices, a slowdown in technology spending, tighter credit, and the negative effects of declining stock prices --
certainly aren't going away. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Chief Economist Stephen Roach argues that with this mix in place, all it would take is one of three "shocks" to shove the U.S. into recession. These include a full-scale energy crisis, brought on by a very cold winter or a war in the Middle East; a weakening dollar, as foreign funds pull out of the U.S.; or a stock-market crash that scares consumers into curbing spending.
Unfortunately, none of these shock scenarios seem far-fetched right now. Roach gives a 40% probability of recession in the first half of 2001. "To me, that is tantamount to maximum alert," he writes.
19 posted on
11/23/2004 5:23:11 PM PST by
Dallas59
("A weak peace is worse than war" - Tacitcus)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson