Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hopespringseternal
That only affects the firstborn?

I always assumed that God used natural agents for the plagues. Beyond that he would have "managed" the circumstances as needed to achieve His end, such as who got infected.

It's just how I picture God working. For example, if God feels the need for a big meteor to strike Sodom on a given date, I have no problem with him causing the chain of events that leads to that a few million years ago.

But then you get into that whole predestination thing and have to ask about the Sodomites free will. But with a name like "Sodomite" you really gotta know nothing goods gonna happen (thats meant as a joke).

Lovely little movie about this idea with Tom Conti and Teri Garr, callled Miracles, of all things.

52 posted on 11/24/2004 4:36:11 AM PST by Phsstpok (often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Phsstpok
It's just how I picture God working.

The problem with consigning God to this role is that you quickly have to leave the pages of the bible to support this view, and at that point why bother to explain it anyway since you have just discredited your source?

Miracles as found in the bible aren't merely unlikely natural processes, they are supernatural. Some have the appearance of nature, but when you study the ten plagues of Egypt you find that natural appearance is just a direct challenge to the gods of the Egyptions. For example, the river turning to blood shows the power of God over that of the god of the Nile.

63 posted on 11/24/2004 8:36:54 AM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson