Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PRUE
If you insist there is some conspiracy, I guess anyone will do. From everything I have seen, Oswald acted alone. He had the means and the "motives", as twisted as they were, and all the circumstancial and physical evidence points squarely at him.

If there were some grand conspiracy with a cast of thousands, how the hell did they manage to keep it quite for 44 years? It completly defies logic for anyone not as kooked-out as Oliver Stone.

78 posted on 11/24/2004 2:05:34 PM PST by Ditto ( No trees were killed in sending this message, but billions of electrons were inconvenienced.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Ditto
If you insist there is some conspiracy,

You insist that oswald acted alone. I see facts in the Report that indicate otherwise.

I guess anyone will do. From everything I have seen, Oswald acted alone.

The Report itself raises many factual doubts. I see them.

He had the means and the "motives", as twisted as they were, and all the circumstancial and physical evidence points squarely at him.

I have no doubt as to oswalds guilt. I have many doubts as to his being the lone gunman.

If there were some grand conspiracy with a cast of thousands, how the hell did they manage to keep it quite for 44 years? It completly defies logic for anyone not as kooked-out as Oliver Stone.

Obviously, there was no grand cast of thousands. Just a few kooks did the deed, and their tracks were then obliterated by a thousand [government] clowns.

89 posted on 11/24/2004 2:56:30 PM PST by PRUE (Prudence indeed dictates that governments should be changed when its time. We're overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson