Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alexander wasn't gay
bible history.com ^ | Craig Johnson

Posted on 11/26/2004 8:59:56 AM PST by SusanD

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
This historian looks at the actual evidence that Alexander was bi-sexual. Answer-- there is no contemporaneous evidence but merely later, unreliable gossip. Alexander had 3 wives and several mistresses. He had children. A deep friendship is not necessarily bi-sexual although most homosexuals interpret any close friendship as homosexual and prove their point by claiming that the denials of same are proof of it.
1 posted on 11/26/2004 8:59:56 AM PST by SusanD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SusanD

By today's standards, everyone is gay.


2 posted on 11/26/2004 9:00:48 AM PST by television is just wrong (Our sympathies are misguided with illegal aliens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SusanD
I don't think we will ever have proof. We can speculate all we want. As for professionals, they often theorize on the basis of information or implication. I just hope hey would label it as such.

PS: Is the issue gay or bisexual. Since we know he had a wife, children and mistresses, it would seem the allegation would be that he swung from both sides of the plate.

3 posted on 11/26/2004 9:03:25 AM PST by verifythentrust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Pssst! Some of us are just jovial.


4 posted on 11/26/2004 9:03:59 AM PST by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SusanD

"Alexander had 3 wives and several mistresses. He had children."


What does that prove?


5 posted on 11/26/2004 9:04:50 AM PST by cripplecreek (I come swinging the olive branch of peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SusanD
A deep friendship is not necessarily bi-sexual although most homosexuals interpret any close friendship as homosexual and prove their point by claiming that the denials of same are proof of it.

Well, they also try to claim David and Jonathan were gay, event though there is no evidence, and their culture and religion was deeply opposed to homosexuality.

Facts and liberalism don't mix.

6 posted on 11/26/2004 9:05:31 AM PST by No_Outcome_But_Victory (Please pray for Ann, my pregnant wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SusanD
Alexander wasn't gay

Alexander wasn't homosexual.

7 posted on 11/26/2004 9:08:13 AM PST by WayneM (Remember; "Saturday people first. Sunday people next.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SusanD

According to the experts on the History Channel on Tuesday night, Allie boy's lover was Hephastian (sp?). Also, when I was in college, we studied Mary Renault's writings. She was considered one of many authorities on ancient Greece. Homosexuality was the norm for males of ancient Greece, especially boys in the bath houses. Women existed to procreate and keep the house while the real pleasure for the boys was in homosexuality.


8 posted on 11/26/2004 9:08:45 AM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
By today's standards, everyone is gay.
Stop, or I'll scratch your eyes out!

9 posted on 11/26/2004 9:12:11 AM PST by DallasMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

It is contemporaneous evidence of Alexander engaging in normal sexual behavior. To be contrasted with the total absence of evidence to the contrary.

Does anyone have information about the early returns of Stone's "gay" movie?


10 posted on 11/26/2004 9:12:42 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SusanD

The word "GAY" has been so misaligned by this Unholy abominal practice.


11 posted on 11/26/2004 9:13:08 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SusanD
Oliver Stone merely mimics the behavior of his world -- Hollywood -- and applies it to ALL his films.

One can only hope Stone stays away from producing childrens' themes.

12 posted on 11/26/2004 9:14:38 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
"Alexander had 3 wives and several mistresses. He had children."

What does that prove?

Only that his natural function was in working order. It does not disprove the negative.

13 posted on 11/26/2004 9:14:48 AM PST by D Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Word is the film is a pain in the @ss...


14 posted on 11/26/2004 9:16:03 AM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SusanD

Don't ax, don't tell...

15 posted on 11/26/2004 9:17:12 AM PST by Libloather (It's still OK to blame the *Crintons for everything...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong

Speak for yourself.


16 posted on 11/26/2004 9:17:48 AM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SusanD

This kind of garbage film making runs in the family. What do you expect from Oliver Stone? His nephew, Matt Stone, produces similar garbage.


17 posted on 11/26/2004 9:19:30 AM PST by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DallasMike

Most gays are queer.


18 posted on 11/26/2004 9:20:09 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SusanD
It's another disgusting attempt to rewrite history to bolster the miserable "gay" life style CHOICE. They are desperately seeking to have someone, who is "gay" as a hero.
19 posted on 11/26/2004 9:22:25 AM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SusanD

Actually, if you read Dioneysseus' critically acclaimed biography of Alexander, you'll know that...

"And yet, despite his prowess upon the field of battle, it was said that Alexander was verily good with colours, always sharply turned out and that he was appreciative of the arts."

And I think we know what that means...


20 posted on 11/26/2004 9:23:01 AM PST by Slipperduke (*fixes bayonet*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson