Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iran Dug Tunnel for Military Network
reuters ^ | 11/27/2004 | milwguy

Posted on 11/27/2004, 6:48:32 PM by milwguy

BERLIN, Nov 27 (Reuters) - Iran is working on a secret nuclear programme for military purposes despite promising the European Union it would halt all activities related to uranium enrichment, the news magazine Der Spiegel said on Saturday.

The magazine said it had obtained documents from an unnamed intelligence agency showing that Iran had dug a secret tunnel near an Isfahan facility preparing raw uranium for enrichment, even though operations there had been stopped.

Iran, which has repeatedly denied trying to develop nuclear weapons, promised the European Union on Nov. 14 it would halt all activities related to uranium enrichment, a process that creates atomic fuel for power plants or weapons.

It then demanded an exemption for some 20 enrichment centrifuges for research purposes, a move Western diplomats argued could torpedo the whole deal. They said Iranian officials in Vienna dropped the demand on Friday, but were waiting for a final decision from Tehran.

Der Spiegel, in an advance release of a report due to appear on Monday, said the secret underground facility near Isfahan could soon be ready to produce large amounts of uranium hexafluoride gas (UF6). Centrifuges that spin at supersonic speed can produce enriched uranium from UF6.

The magazine said that according to the intelligence documents, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei personally issued a directive at the start of October to build the secret tunnel.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: iaea; iran; muslim; nuclearweapon; proliferation; southwestasia; tunnel
More evidence of a the coverup of Iran's nuclear intentions. Negotiations with Islamo-Fascist regimes are doomed to fail. The French/German/British effort has honorable intentions, but can't be accomplished due to the radical muslim mullahs in Iran, who will stop at nothing to have a nuclear weapon. Once they have one, they will use it against us in some way, either by blackmail, or by giving it to Osama to smuggle into out country. The USA must act pre-emptively if necessary to stop their program from advancing.
1 posted on 11/27/2004, 6:48:32 PM by milwguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: milwguy

As usual the MSM fails to report the reason behind iran's activites. Had europe stood up with the US, Britian, Austrailia, Italy and the other members of the coalition, iran would be wondering if they were the next target.

However, france and germany are so insecure and yet arrogant, they thwarthed the US actions. Lybia caved in before they realized how unstable and irrational the europeans are. iran and north korea would have not been as resistant about inspections and closing down their operations if they felt an attack was possible.

But, the MSM will never place the blame where it belongs. Instead they will continue to spew the lies that the Bush Administration failed to put and end to the ambitions of iran and north korea.


2 posted on 11/27/2004, 6:57:44 PM by Trepz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trepz

France and Germany will foreever be pieces of rat excrement. And throw the MSM on the dung heap of history too. They all belong there.


3 posted on 11/27/2004, 7:07:45 PM by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

Iran will be bombed.


4 posted on 11/27/2004, 7:09:59 PM by Milwaukeeprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Milwaukeeprophet
Hopefulley, bombed mercilessly. And if conventional weapons don't do the trick, all options should be on the table.

With no second thought about it.

5 posted on 11/27/2004, 7:13:03 PM by 101st-Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

I'm shocked shocked to find gambling in this casino.......


6 posted on 11/27/2004, 7:21:56 PM by festus (Old growth timbers make the best campfires....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: festus

Remember Jock's words to Tony Blair concerning helping America with the war in Iraq. I believe he said something like you will get nothing out of it, The Americans don't remember how to return a favor'

I really believe that we should cut off all aid to these countries that have proven not to be our allies. Their economy is in the Crapper, so let them go down. The money we will save, 2 Billion from Egypt alone can be better used somewhere else. The Sudan, Poland, even here in our own country. The same for the UN itself. We can do a lot better if we were not mixed up with this International Gangster Org. Pull out and throw them out.


7 posted on 11/27/2004, 7:37:08 PM by 26lemoncharlie (Defending America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 101st-Eagle

The Bunker--buster bombs technology funds were killed just recently.


8 posted on 11/27/2004, 7:38:21 PM by NY Attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

The rest of the article:

" Diplomats say the Iranian attempt to exempt some centrifuges from the deal struck with the European Union was infuriating both the EU, which is offering Tehran a package of economic incentives in exchange for freezing enrichment activities, and Washington which is adamant Iran is trying to produce nuclear arms.

Oil-rich Iran says it wants nuclear power only to meet booming domestic demand for electricity. "


9 posted on 11/27/2004, 8:01:27 PM by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: milwguy

In the long run, I can't see that there is any way to stop nuclear proliferation. If a bomb can be made, it will be made, whether clandestinely or not. In fact, the United States, itself, was once extremely active in trying to spread nuclear power plant construction thruout the world (a step, it seems to me, toward the whole process of nuclear proliferation). I met a nuclear engineer just this week who said he closed a deal to build Iran's first nuclear power plant back in 1968. He told me the cost of that project at that time was $15 million.


10 posted on 11/27/2004, 8:25:14 PM by Mr. Toobeley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude

I don't believe that for a minute!


11 posted on 11/27/2004, 10:34:29 PM by stockpirate (Check out my bio and learn about sKerry and his Socialists friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude

But on the other hand didn't we just develop a bigger bunker buster bomb?


12 posted on 11/27/2004, 10:40:54 PM by stockpirate (Check out my bio and learn about sKerry and his Socialists friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: milwguy
Here is some ragged edge truth to chew on. Armageddon is proof that stopping nuclear proliferation is a lost cause in this world going mad & to hell in a hand basket. The best hope is to slow its rapid pace but even that is a fleeting wish that is based on worthless inept politicians afraid of their own shadows unable to act. Jehovah God will have to re-cycle Terra Firma and separate the sheep from the goats so we can start over!
13 posted on 11/27/2004, 11:28:45 PM by winker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NY Attitude
The Bunker--buster bombs technology funds were killed just recently.

Only the nuclear ones. We've got some "interesting" non-nuclear bunker busters now.

14 posted on 11/28/2004, 1:43:34 AM by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate
But on the other hand didn't we just develop a bigger bunker buster bomb?

No the MOAB, while a heck of a big bomb, is not a bunker buster. More of an area clearance bomb.

15 posted on 11/28/2004, 1:51:25 AM by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

No, I think I read somewhere recently that they increased the size of the BBB to about 25,0000 pounds.


16 posted on 11/28/2004, 1:57:29 AM by stockpirate (Check out my bio and learn about sKerry and his Socialists friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: El Gato

It's another of those measure/countermeasure leapfrogging contests.

The question is whether the bunker-builders can raise the ante to where "conventional" explosives absolutely cannot be made to work.


17 posted on 11/28/2004, 4:44:36 AM by fire_eye (Socialism is the opiate of academia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: El Gato; stockpirate
The Iranians have had the technology and experience from the time of the Shah to erect blast resistant hangers, shelters and other safe havens. If they have gotten the additional technology from the German firm that supplied the bunkers for Saddam the only thing that will destroy them, especially if they are underground are very large capacite BBB or better.
18 posted on 11/28/2004, 4:59:03 AM by NY Attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson