Posted on 11/28/2004 3:17:12 PM PST by Stoat
The condom controversy . . .
November 28, 2004
BY MICHAEL SNEED SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST
Dateline -- Scoopsville . . . Sneed hears Gov. Blagojevich just licked a ticklish situation.
*Translation: The gov, who is the doting father of two girls, quietly but decisively rescinded a Department of Health program where colored and flavored condoms were being distributed free of charge to the public.
*Quoth a top source: "It was a matter of moral values to him."
*To wit: "The governor first read about the program in the Sun-Times and was aghast and so upset that he immediately called for a halt on the distribution of the condoms, which came in orange, grape, lemon and cherry flavors," said a top source. (Lemon?)
*Background: Since January, the Public Health Department spent $115,000 in funds provided by the Bush administration for 5-cent condoms for distribution by public health clinics across the state as a tool to combat sexually transmitted disease, particularly in oral sex.
*Foreground: But a number of state lawmakers were shocked by the purchase of 360,000 of the orange, green, red and blue flavored condoms (out of a total of 910,000 colored condoms) ... feeling such exotic varieties undercut efforts to promote abstinence.
*Conclusion: The gov got rid of the whole colored and flavored shebang . . . although the remaining hundreds of thousands of regular condoms given by the state will not be rescinded
Oh no...does this mean another Michael Moore movie?
Of course, cutting this program means that more people will get pregnant which means that we'll have more abortions. At least, that's wha a liberal would tell you.
If so, hopefully he won't provide an on-camera 'performance' (sorry for the horrific mental imagery)
Well, as long as they don't get rid of the federally-funded vibrator program.....
Of course, cutting this program means that more people will get pregnant which means that we'll have more abortions. At least, that's wha a liberal would tell you.
Actually no...we can credit Michelle Malkin for that:
|
THIS MAY LEAVE A BAD TASTE IN YOUR MOUTH
By Michelle Malkin · November 28, 2004 06:04 PM
Chicago Sun-Times columnist Michael Sneed reports on the fate of Illinois' federally tax-subsidized flavored condom program.
|
It's my understanding that the flavoring is designed to appeal to homosexual consumers. This is a 'family site' and so I won't go into any more detail. Ask a policeman or healthcare worker if more information is needed on such depraved practices.
While we are giving away free condoms why not throw in a free night at the Ritz and gift certificate to Victoria's Secret to complete the deal.
Thanks. You have provided all the information I need to know about that subject.
That'a just wrong.....
Too much, do you think?
Pink Slippers? Now I have seen everything! ROFL
I think
FYI to all: The purpose of FLAVORED condems is so the male can receive oral sex (from a WOMAN!) with reduced risk of giving or receiving an STD........
This program is inherently biased against lebians. Where's the outrage? Why not provide equal funding for exotic edible panties?
It's gone.
This, from a Freeper named 2harddrive......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.