Tart responses that don't respect a poster's words and are more aggressive than ordinary debate are hostile. Also, you are using non sequitur far too frequently and incorrectly. You are trying to label responders to your email as dumb enough to not make logical arguments. In cyberspace this is arrogance and the equivalent of talking so loudly as to drown them out.
If you want to prolong this discussion, perhaps you will look more deeply into the URL you cite and prove to both the lady and I why why we are wrong. And, use your thesaurus to seek out another word that will make your retorts sound more thoughtful.
> perhaps you will look more deeply into the URL you cite and prove to both the lady and I why why we are wrong.
Ahem: already done. Was Tyre destroyed as the Bible said it would be, or not?