Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: COEXERJ145

This would not have been a ruling on homosexual marriage. It would have been a ruling on the restraints of government, specifically the judicial branch of government. They don't get to do the legislating. That's all this was about.


22 posted on 11/29/2004 8:30:14 AM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Legislatures are so outdated. If you want real political victory, take your issue to court.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Don't forget who we're talking about right now. It would not be a stretch of the imagination to see this Court simply decide to rule that homosexual marriage is legal in all 50 states. We know there are already enough Justices on the Court to do just that. Better to keep the issue out of the hands of the 6 black robed tyrants that made sodomy a "right".


26 posted on 11/29/2004 8:33:28 AM PST by COEXERJ145
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson