Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BikerNYC
It will be interesting because at the heart of this are federal benefits, ie. leaving social security to a gay partner. The gay friends I have said this is the over riding issue for them- the ability to provide for their loved ones when they are gone.

Let the states decide, but it will ultimately become a federal issue.

I say let the American people decide.

30 posted on 11/29/2004 8:44:57 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: rintense
It will be interesting because at the heart of this are federal benefits, ie. leaving social security to a gay partner. The gay friends I have said this is the over riding issue for them- the ability to provide for their loved ones when they are gone.

Yes indeed. What it will allow is some AIDs infested person to marry a young stud while on his deathbed and allow the young stud to obtain federal benefits for the rest of his life.

33 posted on 11/29/2004 8:47:24 AM PST by ClintonBeGone (Sometimes it's OK for even a Wolverine to root for a Buckeye win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
Yes, it's about benefits at the federal level. That's all the feds have to offer since they are not in the marriage business.

I remember in law school reading about Social Security cases that struck down rules which granted, for example, benefits to certain widows but not widowers in the same circumstances. I think it's going to be difficult for SCOTUS to uphold a rule which discriminates against some kinds of lawful marriages for the purpose of awarding benefits.
37 posted on 11/29/2004 8:53:04 AM PST by BikerNYC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson