Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Shows us we cannot afford to rest on our laurels.

How can we put together another Reagan-style majority?

1 posted on 11/29/2004 12:53:15 PM PST by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

Iowa and New Mexico still haven't voted?


2 posted on 11/29/2004 12:54:20 PM PST by Rammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Alaska looks like a bug that hit the windshield.


5 posted on 11/29/2004 12:57:06 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Leave it to liberals to create an electoral map that looks like an abortion.


6 posted on 11/29/2004 12:58:10 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

What did you do to Alaska? Are we just a piece of fireweed dander blowing in the wind now?


7 posted on 11/29/2004 12:58:31 PM PST by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Wisconsin and PA will turn Red in coming elections, as will Michigan, and believe it or not, even Minnesota will be red too... When exactly? Can't say, but provided the Dems continue their path to turn the US into a "secular socailist democracy" and the Republicans continue to put up solid candidates.. the midwest will become as RED and reliably so as the south, with perhaps the exception of IL, due to the liberal bastion of Chicago.

The Midwest, and MidAtlantic states are going through the shift that the south went through already..... The population of the remaining blue states will continue to decline as they did in the last census, while the growing economies of the south and other red state areas will continue to increase the red states electoral influence.

The Democrats must reject the radical socialist secular democracy and other fringe groups they now embrace wholey if they desire to ever truly be anything but an obstructionist party again.


8 posted on 11/29/2004 1:01:38 PM PST by HamiltonJay ("You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Simply shows which states have large cities full of government workers and their dependent minions.


9 posted on 11/29/2004 1:02:50 PM PST by BenLurkin (Big government is still a big problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Data manipulation to make the LOSERS feel better. It is done all the time in Powerpoint presentations to lamely try to make questionable sales.
10 posted on 11/29/2004 1:03:00 PM PST by Gorzaloon (This tagline intentionally left blank.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

This is probably the most worthless chart I have ever seen in my life. If they want to show an electoral vote comparison, a simple bar or pie chart will do. All this does is distort the reality that lib voters are mostly concentrated in small geographic urban areas.


11 posted on 11/29/2004 1:03:28 PM PST by Huck (The day will come when liberals will complain that chess is too violent .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

It makes theblue states look fat and lazy.


14 posted on 11/29/2004 1:05:26 PM PST by discostu (mime is money)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

What an ugly map.


15 posted on 11/29/2004 1:05:57 PM PST by Conspiracy Guy (This space is available to advertise your service or product.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Note they didn't do it by county, but by state. by county they look lame even with population size adjustments to county land area.


16 posted on 11/29/2004 1:06:18 PM PST by Rippin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

This fits the blue-state drug induced stupor. Only one of them could read it.


21 posted on 11/29/2004 1:31:14 PM PST by MysticCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
Reagan never had a majority. He always dealt with a Democratic dominated House and the Senate was held until 86. Reagan never had coattails. Bush did. For getting things done Bush is in a far moreadvantageous position than Reagan. He had to deal with talented Democratic politicians who were partisan but not nuts. O'Neill was a far more difficult opponent than Pelosi in her dreams.

If you are saying that the Reps cannnot rest. Absolutely. It is incumbent on Bush to accomplish much these two years to convince many Blue Staters to look to the Republican Party for successful and moral solutions.

22 posted on 11/29/2004 1:36:41 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

This is what liberals see when they look at a map. Must make driving hell.


23 posted on 11/29/2004 1:39:04 PM PST by MisterRepublican ("I must go. I must be elusive.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
"How can we put together another Reagan-style majority?"

Change the mind of 1 out of every 20 voters in California - or get California to distribute their electoral votes proportionally.

31 posted on 11/29/2004 2:02:36 PM PST by capitan_refugio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The major networks have still not called the election for George W. Bush. Maybe Dan Rather will give the order for CBS to call the election for George W. Bush!


36 posted on 11/29/2004 2:38:17 PM PST by Revererdrv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson