Posted on 11/29/2004 1:56:10 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Seventy-nine years ago last summer, a legal carnival convened in the little town of Dayton, Tennessee, as the trial of John Scopes got under way. Banners and lemonade stands lined the streets. People joked that chimpanzees, brought to town to perform in sideshows, actually were in Dayton as witnesses for the trial.
On one side was the American Civil Liberties Union, which had offered to pay the legal expenses of anyone who would challenge a Tennessee law that banned the teaching of Darwin's theory of evolution in public schools and universities. Twenty-four-year-old local science teacher John Scopes was recruited to be charged with violating the law, and Clarence Darrow, long known for his agnostic views and hostility to Christianity, was recruited to head Scopes defense team.
On the other side were traditionalists who supported the law. They were represented by William Jennings Bryan, a former Member of Congress and populist two-time Democrat presidential candidate from Nebraska. Bryan, whose followers had succeeded in getting similar anti-evolution laws introduced into law in fifteen states, said in his opening statement that "if evolution wins, Christianity goes." Darrow argued, "Scopes isn't on trial; civilization is on trial."
And so it went, until Darrow finally asked that his own client be found guilty, a tactic he hoped would lead to a reversal upon appeal and which denied Bryan the opportunity, under Tennessee law, to make a closing statement. The trial would have long range ramifications for the state of public education in America and, in the process, diminish the reputations of both Bryan, who came off as a fundamentalist zealot, and Darrow, whom even liberal law professor Alan Dershowitz today contends showed himself to be "an anti-religious cynic."
Scopes was found guilty and fined $100 for teaching evolution, a penalty that was reversed on appeal (though on a legal technicality and not on constitutional grounds as Darrow had hoped).
Many a Christian fundamentalist has looked back on the Scopes trial as the beginning of a long slide toward the secularism that pervades American society today; and many an ACLU supporter has pointed to it as the beginning of enlightenment in American education. The truth lies somewhere in between.
I believe in creationism. I believe that God created the earth and everything on its face, including human beings. I think it takes a great deal more faith to believe in Darwin's theory of random selection than it does to believe that an all-powerful Supreme Being created all this with a purpose in mind.
That said, I also believe in academic freedom, a concept foreign to many on both sides of this argument, even today. Charging Scopes with a crime in 1925 was a huge mistake on the part of those attempting to stand up for creationism. What could have been a debunked theory if taught side by side with the truth became a crusade for the teaching of evolution as a fact.
Today, the ACLU finds itself in the role of the traditionalists eight decades ago. They scoff at those who believe in anything other than the orthodoxy of the day, and they fight tenaciously to defend their beliefs in the face of growing opposition.
ACLU involvement in a Dover, Pennsylvania, case clearly shows their desperation. Last month, the school board in this rural south-central Pennsylvania community became the first in the nation to mandate the teaching of "intelligent design," which holds that the universe is so complex that it must have been created by a higher power. The "higher power" is unspecified, but that does not matter to the zealots at the ACLU, who endorse ignorance because they believe that any mention or reference to anything remotely like a Supreme Being is "an establishment of religion" and therefore unconstitutional.
Imagine this as the beginning of a movement in American education, with frustrated parents and fed-up school board members taking matters into their own hands. If so, look for the panic to set in at the ACLU, with lawsuits galore as the 21st Century version of Scopes gets under way. Call it Scopes II, only this time the battle could be fought on as many fronts as there are school boards in America.
------------
Doug Patton is a freelance columnist who has served as a speechwriter, policy advisor and communications director for federal, state and local candidates, elected officials and public policy organizations. His weekly columns are published in newspapers across the country and on selected Internet websites. Readers can e-mail him at dpatton@neonramp.com.
--------------------
Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.
Ping for later
See...liberals simply don't believe there is ANY life form more evolved than they are, thus GOD doesn't exist...
Go figure!
The use of this phrase shows that the author knows very little about evolutionary theory.
At least they are being consistant. I do have a problem with what they are doing, but I would have a bigger beef if they allowed this but only because it does not say God.
Agreed. The Penn GOP made a mistake in including this passage.
Oh God! Another Crevo thread. Here we go again!
The problem is not what is being taught in schools but that we are made to pay for a one size fits all plan even if we don't have children. Take government out of the education business. Let charity take care of the hard cases.
I agree with you.
I believe in creationism. I believe that God created the earth and everything on its face, including human beings. I think it takes a great deal more faith to believe in Darwin's theory of random selection than it does to believe that an all-powerful Supreme Being created all this with a purpose in mind.
I think this is funny. I think that is one hell of a stretch to say.
Anyone know what the ACLU would say about the SAP and WAP (Strong and Weak Anthropic Principle) theories? Seems that the intelligent design idea could be considered "scientific" to some extent, right?
There is no problem with science within the Christian community that I know of. There is nothing wrong with believing that God created the world in a wondrous way and we discover it all the time. It is the secularists and nincompoops that believe otherwise.
Muleteam1
They don't actually teach in the public schools anymore; they just force feed the kids a bunch of PC nonsense. Reactions from intelligent kids in public high schools when asked about:
Scientific method: "What's that?"
Exploring and debating alternative theories: "No time..."
Learning to enjoy math as a tool: "Huh? We hate math. Doesn't everybody?"
Joining a sports team: "Of course. How else can you get into a good college?" (Grades?)
Literature: "The Color Purple is so real".
This is purely anecdotal of course, but seriously, whatever happened to a solid, classical education?
You complain about evolutionists being "dogmatic," but you won't even acknowledge what evolutionists are claiming. Evolutionists understand the "God did it" theory of the world; do you understand evolutionary theory? If so, why would the term "random selection" be capable of describing it?
First, because there is no conflict between Judaism and Christianity and evolutionary theory, as has been stated by the highest authorities in those religions time and time again. Evolution is a mechanism. It has nothing to say about how the mechanism and the physical laws that govern it were set up.
Secondly, because as a good scientific theory, there is much evidence to back up evolution, and none that contradicts it.
Thirdly, because the leading contenders have no science to back them up.
Muleteam1
That may be the plan, but it won't work.
It flies in the face of logic: Christianity is a religion that recruits nonbelievers. It would be contradictory to the fundamentals of the religion to deliberately create an ethical divide.
Such as?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.