The Oil Bubble II

In my column last month (“The Oil Bubble: Set to Burst?”) I discussed the speculative factors that pushed oil prices to all-time highs. I pointed out that despite fear of supply outages stemming from terrorism and a series of odd events, virtually every fear so far has gone unrealized: Terrorism has not removed a single barrel of oil production. Oil output in Saudi Arabia, instead of falling due to terrorism as some have feared, has increased by more than 1 million barrels a day. OPEC has steadily increased production and consistently outpaced analyst estimates of its capacity. Production at Russian oil giant Yukos has not fallen. And, despite a difficult war in Iraq, production in that country has averaged 2 million barrels a day this year — a 68 percent year-over-year increase. The only meaningful supply interruption to hit the oil industry this year was four back-to-back hurricanes in the southeastern U.S.

All of these non-shocks are sucking some of the speculative air out of oil prices. In the past three weeks, despite no significant developments on the macro front, oil prices have fallen by more than $9 a barrel to around $46. There was a similar correction at the end of August when fears of a terrorist attack during the Republican convention went unrealized. The “fear” premium in oil, approximately $15 a barrel currently, fluctuates with events, but I continue to believe that the absence of a significant prolonged supply outage will gradually push speculative money out of oil.

In addition to speculation and fear, improvement in demand earlier this year played a role in the oil-price rise. Growing oil consumption led to concern about the level of spare production capacity and a debate about how much of the upswing in oil prices was due to speculation and how much might be due to fundamentals. Until recently, oil-price appreciation did not seem to affect consumption. However, this is no longer the case.

U.S. oil demand grew 1.6 percent in the third quarter, down from 2.3 percent in the first half, according to the Department of Energy. Gasoline demand in the third quarter was flat with a year ago, after increasing 2.4 percent in the first half. In third-quarter conference calls, every major oil company and independent refiner that provided domestic same-store gasoline-sales information noted deterioration. Conservation and changes in consumer preferences (both in response to high gasoline prices) and perhaps the modest slowdown in economic growth have impacted demand.

Gasoline demand typically falls when the nationwide average retail price exceeds $1.60 a gallon. Currently, the average retail gasoline price is $2.01 a gallon. In a relatively short period of time, consumer preferences have changed. Sales of mid- and large-size sport utility vehicles declined 1 percent in the third quarter despite large discounts and rebates offered by manufacturers. At the same time, sales of fuel-efficient hybrids — such as the Honda Insight and Toyota Prius — grew more than tenfold in the third quarter from a year ago.

The importance of the U.S. gasoline market cannot be overstated given its size. Third-quarter gasoline demand was 9.2 million barrels a day. Demand for this one product matches the consumption of all petroleum products in China, India, and all of Eastern Europe combined. Even a small change in U.S. gasoline consumption has a pronounced impact on world oil demand.

U.S. jet fuel consumption has also slowed. The DOE reports that jet-fuel demand growth slowed from 3.2 percent in the first half of 2004 to 1.7 percent in the third quarter. While the growth rate in available seat miles for commercial flights declined modestly, the slowdown in fuel consumption may be influenced more by cost-cutting measures. As fuel prices rose airlines reduced engine idle time when planes were not in motion, cut wind resistance by polishing aircraft exteriors on more frequent schedules, and reduced flight speeds and the amount of fuel carried.

Chinese oil consumption has also been strong, but estimates show a slowdown from the torrid pace of earlier this year. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), oil demand increased by 19 percent in the first quarter and 25 percent in the second, but only 7 percent in the third.

More recently, the Chinese government has moved to slow consumption and economic growth by allowing refined product prices to rise (although prices remain below world market levels), tightening credit, and increasing interest rates. Also, coal-fired power generation has reportedly increased, reducing the call on more expensive diesel-powered generators.

Historically, China’s oil demand has grown fast, averaging just under 6 percent annually in the past decade, although growth has been erratic. The International Energy Agency estimates that oil demand grew 19.3 percent in 1993, followed by no growth in 1994. Similarly, demand grew by 7 percent in 2000, only to be followed by 2 percent growth in 2001.

Meanwhile, on the supply end, oil production outside of OPEC has reached a record high at more than 50 million barrels a day in October, according to the IEA. Aside from the hurricane impact, production has been steadier this year than in the past. Production should rise by 600,000 barrels a day in the fourth quarter as shut-in Gulf of Mexico production returns and new fields in West Africa ramp up. In 2005, non-OPEC production should rise by 1.3 million barrels a day compared with world oil-demand growth of 1.4 million barrels a day.

As for OPEC, production has surpassed everyone’s expectations, with production higher than expected for the most unlikely members — Libya, Iran, and Nigeria. Since mid-year 2003, these three nations have increased production by 800,000 barrels a day. In the same time frame, OPEC (excluding Venezuela and Iraq) has increased production by 2.3 million barrels a day. In total, OPEC has increased output by over 4 million barrels a day to 30.3 million barrels a day.

After a pullback in U.S. crude-oil inventories in August, as refined products built, and the hurricane effects of September, oil stocks have resumed their upward course. This confirms industry data showing that supply has exceeded demand all year. Year to date, DOE data show that crude-oil inventories held by industry rose by 19 million barrels. Inventories rose in each of the past six weeks, by a total of 20.2 million barrels, as hurricane recovery began. In addition, the U.S.-government-held Strategic Petroleum Reserve has increased by 33.3 million barrels so far this year, with other reserves worldwide also in well-built positions.

The recent retreat in oil prices reflects only a small pinhole in the oil bubble. Fundamentally, oil prices should be in the high $20-a-barrel range today, based on supply/demand economics and current inventory levels. Eventually, the barrel price should decline to the low $20s as oil inventories continue to build. The oil price still reflects about $15 a barrel of speculation.

The oil bubble will indeed burst. The inventory rise will continue, thereby justifying a lower price fundamentally and reducing the fear premium. Production should grow on schedule without major interruptions. The absence of a supply shock should also reduce speculation. Finally, a weakening price will feed on itself.

— Frederick P. Leuffer, CFA, is senior managing director and senior energy analyst for Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.

Forgive my ignorance..., but does that mean the prior to the high prices, we've (Avg Americans) have been ripping off the oil companies?

It means that, contrary to the predictions of the doomsayers on the left (who have predicted shortages of everything from oil to copper and other metals), commodity prices, when adjusted for inflation, have remained steady or fallen over the past 30 years. In a reasonably free market, there is no "ripping off" of either party -- the buyer and seller agree on the price. A significant percentage of the absolute price increase over the past decade can be blamed on the government, due to higher gasoline taxes, and to environmental mandates requiring refineries to produce special formula gasolines for specific markets. Instead of mass-producing one type of regular unleaded, to be sold across the country, refineries must make smaller amounts of many special blends. This increases production costs, and also increases the risk of price spikes if there are facility problems at a refinery.

Thanks! That's just what I thought. So why all the fuss about gas prices? As a percentage of our total expenditures they are actually less than in the past and have always been significantly less than what citizens of other countries have to pay.

This is Non-Issue.

Be glad you live in this great country, with great, efficient corporations that provide goods and services at the lowest cost possible....

He could have told them that price gouging would not be tolerated. Set the Justice Dept to investigate this(instead of watching head shops), thereby causing second thoughts amongst the crooked enterprises. That would have gone a long way to keeping prices at least slightly lower, and would have been the miminum required.

When the price dropped to around $10 a barrel, the big boys just consolidated power. It is the same with the EPA regulations. They complain about them, while silently cheering. It chased out nearly all of the independent stations, as they could not afford to replace the tanks in the ground yet again.

In addition, the U.S.-government-held Strategic Petroleum Reserve has increased by 33.3 million barrels so far this year, with other reserves worldwide also in well-built positions.

A recent ForbesMag columnist calculated a ten dollar / barrel premium on the Guvment's buying spree for the Strategery Reserve, which will go on through early '04, apparently, when the tanks will be full. Just another IOU Dubya is paying for Clintoon. As oil falls, look for various other current hysterias to settle, including the dollar, inflation, etc.

Hey Willie, didn't you say globalism was causing oil production to fall?

DOMESTIC production, dummy.

Despite political promises to make us less dependent on imported energy,
domestic oil production has steadily declined from 9.2 million bbls/day in '73 to 5.4 million bbls/day in '04.
Imported oil, OTOH, has skyrocketed to over 10 million bbls/day, making us dependent on foreign nations for 2/3 of our supply.
(source)

I understand what your saying and agree with most of it; even though you haven't answered the question directly.

You asked if, prior to the high prices, American consumers had been "ripping off" the oil companies. My answer was no, in a relatively free market, there is no such thing as "ripping off" the other party in the transaction. Buyer and seller agree on price.

But if that's true, then why not a gradual shift in price?

A few reasons. First, like the stock market, some of the price movement is due to the action of speculators. Second, an unexpected, temporary drop in supply (due, say, to a hurricane hitting an oil refinery) will cause a sudden spike in price. Also, in the gasoline market, there is a very tight balance between supply and demand. It is not as if people can stop buying gasoline entirely if the price increases. So it takes a proportionally higher increase in price in order to bring demand into line with the available supply.

DOMESTIC production, dummy.

Nice try Willie, here's what you said:

"You mean how globalism reduces productive capacity to drive up prices for those commodities?"

Willie Wisdom

How does increasing oil production in a global market equal reduced productive capacity?

You really think we could produce 9.2 million bbls/day in the US now? Or 15.4 million bbls/day?

Exactly what do you think the GW has to do with oil prices? If you want to blame someone, blame Clinton for allowing BP to sell Alaskan crude to Japan, ensuring that Alaskan crude trades on the world market. But even that is a difficult relationship to prove.

The best way to protect yourself from oil price increases is to buy stock in an oil company. Conoco-Phillips stock has more than doubled this year.

How does increasing oil production in a global market equal reduced productive capacity?

Reduced DOMESTIC productive capacity.
Increased global production undermines domestic sources which are subjected to more stringent environmental regulations.
I cited refinery closings, but Toddsterpatriot "wisdom" denies that refineries have anything to do with petroleum production.

You really think we could produce 9.2 million bbls/day in the US now? Or 15.4 million bbls/day?

I think we can produce more than we do by drilling offshore and in ANWR, though not enough to completely offset imports. However, we can also significantly reduce our consumption by constructing electricly powered mass transportation systems in our more densely populated regions and urban areas: light-rail, high-speed rail and Maglev. It is not a panacea, but constructed over a period of time, such technology WILL make our transportation infrastructure less dependent on imported oil.

Reduced DOMESTIC productive capacity. Increased global production undermines domestic sources which are subjected to more stringent environmental regulations.

Ok Willie, if domestic oil production drops 1 million bbls/day and world production increases by 3 million bbls/day and consumption remains the same, what happens to the price?

I cited refinery closings, but Toddsterpatriot "wisdom" denies that refineries have anything to do with petroleum production.

Willie, this sounds silly, even for you. Refineries have nothing, as in zero, to do with oil production. We could triple refining capacity in the US and that would add not one barrel to our domestic oil production.

I think we can produce more than we do by drilling offshore and in ANWR, though not enough to completely offset imports.

Whadda ya know, we agree. I don't agree with your train ideas but more nuclear wouldn't hurt either.

Ok Willie, if domestic oil production drops 1 million bbls/day and world production increases by 3 million bbls/day and consumption remains the same, what happens to the price?

It increases because we've become less productive and the trade and budget deficits combine to devalue our currency.

It increases because we've become less productive and the trade and budget deficits combine to devalue our currency.

Wow!! An extra 1 million bbls/day will cause our currency to be devalued? That will have a larger effect than an extra 2 million bbls/day sloshing around the world oil market? Interesting theory with no basis in fact.

How about if we produced all 16 million bbls a day we consume and then the Saudi Arabia's oilfields and pipelines were destroyed. What happens to the price of our oil?

I guess supply and demand is a bit over your head?

Not at all.
You just erroneously assume that I take your babblings seriously.
Our petro-dependence isn't a simple short-term issue of economic supply and demand.
Global depletion in a long-term issue with severe national security ramifications.

"You mean how globalism reduces productive capacity to drive up prices for those commodities?"

Check this out, Willie says globalism reduces productive capacity for a global product, then he says he meant domestic production.

Then he tries to claim refineries have something to do with oil production. He doesn't understand supply and demand. I'm getting worried about him. Always talking about trains....Isn't one of the symptoms of Alzheimer's reverting to childhood? I'll bet when he was a kid he had a nice Lionel set under the tree. What do you think?

Can we get a neighbor to check on him?

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.