Much is always made of "warnings" before attacks. The OKC Bombing, the first WTC Attack, even 9-11. "Why didn't someone do something?" is always the cry. What I have always wondered is this, How many warning are there a year about these things and nothing happens? I can see why a lot of these threats are filed away.
The point is not "warnings" before attacks that were earlier it’s what was done after or not done after that left the door open to the next.
The first WTC Attack in 93 the, two U.S. embassies in Africa bombed in 98 the Cole in 99 all done by Islamic terrorists the question being did we leave the door open to 9-11.
Now add in The OKC Bombing where Islamic terrorists linked to this and buried or dismissed for political reason by Clinton
Because bottom line the OKC Bombing done by domestic right winger extremist saved Clinton politically he used to slap down his critic on the right
An OKC Bombing linked Islamic terrorists would have hurt Clinton politically because there would he would be pressed to step up and do something by the middle/right while his base on the left would be dragging there feet
This is also why there still open question on TWA800 in 96 and even Atlanta Olympics bombing (some anomalies and a politically motive to bury Islamic terrorist’s links if there)
One off anomalies cases are one thing, multiple anomalies cases with politically motive to bury or dismissed Islamic terrorist’s links is another …. It’s hard to connect the dots leading to 911 2001 if that was someone with politically motive was whitening out/whitewashing some of the dots to save there ass during the 90’s