Posted on 12/02/2004 2:30:49 PM PST by Natty Boh
I know it's an old report, but I can hardly find any discussion of this matter on these boards. Farm subsidies are the single biggest remaining example of socialist central planning in the US. And just what do we get for the $180 billion we are spending? Don't start the "no farm, no food" chant -- it's like "four legs good, two legs bad". The vast majority of farm subsidies go to rich individuals and corporations; subsidies do little to guarantee our food security. We could guarantee a minimum income to all farming families for a fraction of what we are currently spending and family farmers would be just as well off. Let the market set the price for food and end socialism in the Midwest!
You got my vote.
I seem to recall that a hidden provision of the last farm bill or some other similar legislation made illegal the release of lists of recipients and the amounts of largess they received. Does anyone know if this provision actually made it into law?
have you ever seen that website where you can put an address
and find out how much they're getting in farm subsidies?
I wish I could remember it. I was surprised to see my old neighbor was the largest gomint welfare queen in the county.
Ping.
That is the problem,we have had a cheap food policy here since Roosevelt.
The gov.causes surpluses and low counter prices than has to pick the farmer up because he is paid low prices.
Like social security the gov never should have got into commodity pricing but deeply entangled in it now.
I don't disagree.
Bingo!
It's always been the case that the taxayer-funded subsidies only get handed out to the big agribusinesses almost exclusively. It would be a big help to the family farm if they were discontinued althgether. It would level the playing field a bit.
Governments intervene in this natural "feast or famine" production cycle with crop subsidies to assure that the populace is provided with a stable and abundant food supply by preventing too many farmers from going out of business. It is an imperfect solution, but preferable to food shortages and famine.
I agree, and I live in the middle of farm country.
bonk.
It's at The Environmental Working Group.
Agreed, farm subsidies have to go.
New slogan: "Streamline, consolidate, and reduce."
Provocative first post. Welcome to Free Republic, Natty Boh. |
It's never as simple as some people want others to believe -
Not all "family" farms are run by "rich" people -
Seems like a smack - everything else American has been destroyed or come under attack - why not include this -
just my thoughts -
You get the funding of schools changed and then the farm subsidies would be no big deal. Really makes no difference to me about the junk public schools being in trouble as we homeschooled, but we still have to fund them anyway. Seally Rucks!
I'm sure Jimmah Carter, Peanut Farmer would be all for this...NOT. Peanut growers have a near-monopoly like few others do.
Works for me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.