To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
The rifles were modified to remove the automatic firing capability. The original rifle can keep firing for as long as the shooter holds the trigger, while these rifles fire just one shot for each squeeze, officials said. No offense to any law enforcement types here, but after some spray-and-pray shootouts by cops in the past, I say 'thank God.'
2 posted on
12/03/2004 1:56:44 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Still, it's an excellent firearm. They need some of this in San Francisco...
3 posted on
12/03/2004 2:00:27 PM PST by
Edgerunner
(The left ain't right. Hand me that launch pickle...)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
So they'll use the three round burst instead of the fully automatic. I was partial to the A1 in basic training. Didn't like the A2. Then I got to carry the M-205, an M-16 with a grenade launcher attached, in permanent party.
Will cops get to use the fully automatic M-60 next?
5 posted on
12/03/2004 2:02:42 PM PST by
rdb3
(LoRdZ of the Gen-X Republican Rebellion -- rdb3 "HiP-hOp FReeper")
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Hope they spend some time at the range.
7 posted on
12/03/2004 2:09:10 PM PST by
Conspiracy Guy
(This space is available to advertise your service or product.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
How... antiquated. My department, in CA, allows officers, any and all officers, who qualify with an AR-15 to carry one on duty, every shift. It sits right there in the lock, next to the Remington.
It's actually become quite passe, and I got tired of the bother, so it's just me, my Sig .45 and the .12 gauge.
10 posted on
12/03/2004 2:14:50 PM PST by
Pahuanui
(When a foolish man hears of the Tao, he laughs out loud)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
(snip)The rifles were modified to remove the automatic firing capability.
Uh... wouldn't that make them AR15s? Not that there's anything wrong with that but wouldn't you rather have a new AR15 than a stripped down or modified M16A1?
11 posted on
12/03/2004 2:16:50 PM PST by
edchambers
("Pajama clad Neocon footsoldier of the Haliburton Death squad")
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
I wouldn't buy the Colt version. Give me a Bushmaster.
16 posted on
12/03/2004 3:05:15 PM PST by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
If they don't have a H&K MP5 in every vehicle, then they're not up to par with Dalworthington Gardens, Texas.
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
24 posted on
12/03/2004 3:31:48 PM PST by
7.62 x 51mm
(• veni • vidi • vino • visa • "I came, I saw, I drank wine, I shopped")
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
The rifles were modified to remove the automatic firing capability Unless they were built on new recievers, the BATFE still considers them machine guns. If the arsenal can do the rebuild for police, why not for sale to The People via the CMP? Hmm?
Although I think I'd rather have a reworked M-14 myself. Oh heck, I'll take one of each.
26 posted on
12/03/2004 3:35:02 PM PST by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
29 posted on
12/03/2004 3:43:31 PM PST by
Whataday
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Remember the North Hollywood shootout in February 1997 between LAPD and a small group of bank robbers?
The bad guys were dressed in full body armor and carried fully automatic weapons. Do you remember what the
cops were armed with?
32 posted on
12/03/2004 3:50:58 PM PST by
O.C. - Old Cracker
(When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
7.? ?ianapolis police officers were training to use M-16 rifles, with the weapons expected to be available to patrol officers by the end of the week, officials said.
Plenty of time for practice.
The Pistons won't be in town until 12 -25.
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
Why not cut to the chase and give the cops ground attack aircraft and artillery.
Domestic disturbance on Maple Street? No problem, take out the whole block.
Like Stalin said, "Better to hang 100 innocent men than let one guilty one go free."
39 posted on
12/03/2004 6:44:27 PM PST by
NMC EXP
(Choose one: [a] party [b] principle.)
To: 4.1O dana super trac pak
I have a problem with this! I believe in my heart that this violates the "Posse Cummotatis[sp] of the Constitution. If I am wrong please tell me.
There is to be NO military or police connections ever! Training police to use military weapons is wrong. Yes some officers are reservists [GOD Bless them too!] If I read the documents right this is against the law!
47 posted on
12/04/2004 12:03:31 PM PST by
TMSuchman
(American by birth,rebel by choice, MARINE BY GOD!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson