actually I think he did it, but maybe with help or maybe NOT the way the prosecution said. This guy was found guilty with LOTS less evidence than what OJ was found NOT guilty with. Meaning there was alot more evidence that OJ was guilty than this guy Scott.
To another poster, I know how long the Judge has been on the bench, but dont think for one moment that he or other judges dont try to hurry cases up.
I think of all the people over the last few years that have been exonerated. Why were they exonerated? Because of JUDGES and Lawyers putting someone in jail in a "Hurried" fashion just to get the case over with.
By the way, throwing 100lbs of dead weight over a boat without it tipping can not be done! this was even shown on Fox news. Why do you all think the Judge would NOT allow that one piece of evidence?? Because it would have put doubt into the Jury's mind!
http://www.theconservativerepublican.com/scottpeterson.html
Lookie here Howlin.
Another self promoter using FR.
Maybe he has a poo poo screen name at CTV too. LOL.
A 5 month trial is a real "hurry-up" thang, isn't it?
Interesting. It seems that info should have been allowed in. Couldn't he have foreseen that would be a difficulty and planned around it?
Did you follow the OJ trial? The verdict had nothing to do with the evidence. Jury members said their verdict was payback for Rodney King.
I also believe Geragos attempt to tip the boat over took three tries. Someone correct me if I'm wrong.