Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MaineRepublic
"I'd go for 3 or 4 kids if it wasn't so much work. Hats off to those who can handle this many kids without breaking anything against a wall, you have the gift of patience."

I had four. As a rule, by the time the last one arrives, the oldest one is big enough to help out a little. They also help teach and discipline the younger siblings. It doesn't cost any more for a 10-pound bag of potatoes for a family of six or eight than it does for a 10-pound bag of potatoes for a family of three or four, even though it may have to purchased a little more often. Clothes often get handed down, as do toys, bedrooms, etc. The important things in life are often more easily understood in larger families. I am right in the middle of seven, my husband was next-youngest of eight. His parents came from equally large families. My father had nine siblings. Out of all of it, nobody starved, and all got at least an eighth-grade education. Big families are practical and warm, generally.

53 posted on 12/07/2004 6:05:06 PM PST by redhead ("Gee, Ricky. I'm sorry your mom blew up...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: redhead
As a rule, by the time the last one arrives, the oldest one is big enough to help out a little.

Already true, and I only have two so far. The 3yo helps the 1yo and they entertain each other as well. When I tell people two is easier than one they think I'm nuts.

69 posted on 12/07/2004 8:37:02 PM PST by practicalmom (Adopt a soldier at http://www.operationac.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson