Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hopespringseternal
It adds a ton of respectibility to something that has always been considered to be hardly more than a big, messy bomb.

How can you use the terms "respectibility" [sic] and "government" in the same thesis? Nothing the government has EVER done has been efficient or "respectable," at least not in the commercial sense of the word.

One of the big hurdles to commercial spaceflight the idea that it is not accomplished by a transportation system, but rather by a more or less controlled explosion.

Who has this notion? If a rocket is a "controlled explosion," then jet flight isn't much better. TO many people, it is even more mysterious than rockets. And in any case, how does the FAA change any of that perception? It isn't as though their involvement means that rocket flight is now somehow safer or has advanced in technology. It just means that the bureaucrats now have control over who plays the game.

22 posted on 12/09/2004 12:16:17 PM PST by IronJack (R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: IronJack
How can you use the terms "respectibility" [sic] and "government" in the same thesis?

Do you want to learn something, are just looking for another dead horse to beat?

Do you really think the rest of Free Republic is ignorant of the nature of government and just needs you to straighten us out?

It just means that the bureaucrats now have control over who plays the game.

Check your assumptions. The bureaucrats have always had control over the game. The difference now is that the bureaucrats have to go on record as to when they will say yes. Before this, the answer was simply, "No, and don't bother asking."

24 posted on 12/09/2004 12:26:27 PM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson