[bahblahbah]

Does she have the "documents" to prove it?

Different people came up with the same concepts without direct contact with each other though out history.

[ImphClinton]

According to court documentation, an FBI investigation discovered that more than thirty minutes had been edited from the original film, in attempt to avoid penalties for copyright infringement. The investigation also stated that "credible witnesses employed at Warner Brothers came forward, claiming that the executives and lawyers had full knowledge that the work in question did not belong to the Wachowski Brothers." These witnesses claimed to have seen Stewart's original work and that it had been "often used during preparation of the motion pictures." The defendants tried, on several occasions, to have Stewart's case dismissed, without success.

Next time read the whole story. Obviously she had the documentation she won the case and the people involved in making the movie knew of her prior work. Do you guys work for ViaCom????

[Texas2step]

Does she have the "documents" to prove it? If you would bother to read the story, you would have noticed that she had a copyrighted work, "The Third Eye". They stole the story from her, and then used everything in their power to keep her from profiting from a 2+ billion dollar enterprise based on her story.

Again, if you would have bothered to read the article, you would see that she had responded to an ad, placed by the Wachoswski's, and submitted her copyrighted work to them. They gave her a rejection slip, and then kept the story anyway. It was a classic case of stolen work. At least that was work the court of law found.