Circumstantial evidence. Motive and opportunity. Yet evidence that would not be enough to convince someone like yourself.
Edited by me to shorten the read.
Michael Skakel convicted of murder
Email to a Friend Printer Friendly Version
(Norwalk-AP, June 8, 2002 Updated 12:43 PM) _ Kennedy cousin Michael Skakel's best hope to appeal his murder conviction would be to challenge the rulings that allowed the case to proceed to trial.
That's according to outside legal experts weighing in on the high-profile verdict.
Skakel was convicted Friday of beating Greenwich neighbor Martha Moxley to death in 1975 when they were 15 _ a crime that went unsolved for nearly a generation and raised suspicions his family connections had protected him.
Prosecutors offered no eyewitnesses and no direct physical evidence connecting Skakel to the slaying. Instead, the case was based almost entirely on testimony from people who said they had heard him confess over the years.
The 41-year-old Skakel, a nephew of Robert F. Kennedy's widow, Ethel, was handcuffed and led off immediately to jail. He faces from 10 years to life in prison at sentencing July 19.
.....
Martha's battered body was discovered under a tree on her family's estate in the wealthy community of Greenwich. She had been bludgeoned and stabbed with a golf club, later traced to a set owned by Skakel's mother.
Prosecutors contended Skakel had a crush on Martha and was upset because she seemed more interested in his older brother, Thomas.
The prosecution's case rested almost entirely on about a dozen people who said they had heard Skakel confess or make incriminating statements over the years. Several were former classmates from the Elan School, a drug and alcohol rehab center for rich kids in Maine.
The defense argued that the Elan School witnesses were of dubious credibility. And family members all backed up Skakel's alibi: that he was at a cousin's home around the time of the slaying. His lawyers also sought to cast suspicion on a former family tutor, and pointed out that the tutor and Thomas Skakel were both early suspects in the investigation.
Skakel did not take the stand. In a tape-recorded 1997 interview with an author that was played for the jury, Skakel said he went to the Moxley home, threw rocks at Martha's window to try to get her attention, then masturbated in a tree and ran home.
....
"For all our fascination with forensics, for all the absolutes of science, confessions count, witnesses count," said University of California law professor Susan Estrich. "In many respects, the time lag made it an old-fashioned trial, a question of who _ not what _ do you believe."