Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Doubts Persist About Election Results
Yahoo! ^

Posted on 12/10/2004 11:56:05 AM PST by frog_jerk_2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: frog_jerk_2004
You forgot to post

Tin Foil Hat Alert

in your description line.
21 posted on 12/10/2004 12:43:30 PM PST by ssaftler (Pats Win! Sox Win! Kerry Loses! Massachusetts goes 3 for 3 in '04!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog_jerk_2004

Is it true that the Electorl College votes are cast Monday? If so that ends all the lawsuits and recounts.


22 posted on 12/10/2004 12:45:21 PM PST by bayourod ("current laws against hiring illegal workers are virtually unenforceable" Tom Tancredo 12/08/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog_jerk_2004

Who controls the county governments in the areas of Ohio where voters were allegedly disenfranchised by long lines and other tactics that Jackson claims were designed to keep minorities from voting? Republicans or Democrats?


23 posted on 12/10/2004 12:49:54 PM PST by freespirited (Kerry ravaged the reputation of Vietnam vets in a manner reminiscent of a creepy liar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog_jerk_2004

The socialists, e.g., the democrat party is just trying to destroy confidence in the election system over a protracted period of time. They know that during the next election cycle, they can continue to cast doubt and eventually they can flat out steal the one thing that makes a democracy, the individual vote!


24 posted on 12/10/2004 1:13:06 PM PST by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frog_jerk_2004

The slow, painful death of journalism in the country began when jouralists decided it was acceptable to use statements like "some say" or "many critics disagree" to introduce an opposing point of view.

These statements are never sourced and mislead by suggesting that there is a legitimate, rational basis for the point. Journalists should always label their sources for such statements. If "some say", give us the names of the "some". If "many critics disagree", give us the names of the critics. Let us be the judge of the value of the point based on who put it forth.

Of course, the sad truth is that the source of the criticism is almost always the network themselves.


25 posted on 12/10/2004 1:14:10 PM PST by Fishface (teach a man to fish...he eats for a lifetime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson