Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FBD

I think what you are referring to is an M-1025/1026 with a armor kit bolted on. Yes we had those too. The kits add a LOT of weight, and it DOES wear down the parts etc... but, they worked. My company lost 0 soldiers in 13 months because of the armor plating.


79 posted on 12/12/2004 12:13:52 AM PST by SFC Chromey (Did 13 months in Iraq and of COURSE I voted for BUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: SFC Chromey

yeah, I got my facts mixed up, thanks for correcting me.
It is the add-on armor kits for older models that have the suspension problems, etc.

www.InsideDefense.com Vol. 16, No. 35 -- August 30, 2004:

"The additional armor has been problematic for many of the older vehicles, causing suspension and drivetrain wear.

“All humvees are not made to be armored,” said a spokesman for AM General.

To mitigate some of the strain, the Army is adding horsepower and beefing up the suspension of old Humvees through its recapitalization program, said Steve Roberts, assistant product manager for Humvee recapitalization within the programexecutive office for combat support combat service support."

"AM General also is beginning to make two new models that have stronger chassis designed to better withstand the impact of armor..."


82 posted on 12/12/2004 1:17:31 AM PST by FBD ("You have enemies? Good-That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life." Churchhill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson