To: Diogenesis
My last post should have read SA-2 GUIDELINE - Not SA-3. If you believe that the vials contained SARIN and the warhead at Kirkuk is a chemical warhead then here is one for you. You can use this to your hearts content as proof of an Iraqi SCUD found by US troops. Please feel free to publish it all over Freepers along with the vials and green band warhead. You do realise the consequence of US troops finding an SS-1 SCUD in Iraq. Don't you? Please bare in mind that this comes from usinfo.state.gov:
Abandoned Iraqi Scud missile mounted on a mobile launcher along the Tigris River on the outskirts of Baghdad, June 4. 1,400 experts have just arrived in Iraq to begin a detailed investigation of Saddam Husseins weapons industry. Visiting U.S. forces in the Gulf June 5, President Bush pledged to "reveal the truth" about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction.
10 posted on
12/11/2004 9:46:52 AM PST by
Tommyjo
To: Tommyjo
You post is disingenuous about what I posted.
Furthermore, your link says the warhead was not tested as of the time of the post
despite your false claim otherwise.
So, beyond your insults, exactly what is your reason
for your attitude with no facts to support yourself?
11 posted on
12/11/2004 10:06:18 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
To: Tommyjo
Please tell us where you get your special knowledge,
because the link you posted supports EXACTLY what I wrote and not what you wrote.
Your ad hominems and false statements don't do you well, BTW.
So, what picture of anything are you exactly talking about?
13 posted on
12/11/2004 10:15:32 AM PST by
Diogenesis
(Si vis pacem, para bellum)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson