Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather
"I can't for the life of me understand why Kerry isn't fighting harder for this."

Because every Ohio Democratic official and party hack knows that Democrats typically steal about 50,000 votes in every Ohio election.

The Democrats know that if a real investigation is done the investigators will find much fraud on Kerry's behalf and none on Bush's. What happened this time is that Bush had enough poll watchers so that it was a lot harder for Democrats to steal votes than it had been in the past.

What the Democrats accomplished by their claims of voter fraud in 2000, is to greatly reduce the amount of fraud the democrats could commit in 2004.

10 posted on 12/12/2004 6:11:53 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Common Tator

It makes them pine for the days when they could hold back the votes til they were needed.


12 posted on 12/12/2004 6:14:13 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
I think you are absolutely right! Kerry didn't fight the Ohio results because an investigation would reveal not only the traditional, highly organized and systemic Democrat voter fraud. Kerry knew an investigation would reveal the democrats' newest weapon: the illegal registration and absentee fraud perpetrated by Moveon.org with Soros money.

The Democrats were certain Kerry would win Ohio, "if every vote is counted", their talking heads declared. There's no doubt in my mind that the Kerry campaign was certain of an illegal victory in Ohio. So was John Zogby.

21 posted on 12/12/2004 6:52:59 AM PST by YaYa123 (@Still Savoring Ohio.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Common Tator
Because every Ohio Democratic official and party hack knows that Democrats typically steal about 50,000 votes in every Ohio election.

The irony of the 2004 election is that the Democrats (DNC) complained so much so loudly of supposed "Republican fraud" prior to Nov. 2 that it forced the RNC and the GOP watchdogs to launch a massive watchdog effort, which thereby prevented the Democrats from swindling their usual 2 or 3 percent of ADDITIONAL phantom votes from inner cities and union strongholds.

Even with our diligence, there supposedly were some VOTER REGISTRATION PADDING attempts by rabid Dems in liberal cities like Philadelphia, but with the eyes of the nation focusing like a laser on each precinct, McCauliff and the unions could not stack the deck as easily as they've done in the past.

After all, isn't it amazing how votes did not magically appear from after hours polls in St. Louis, or at Indian reservations in Arizona, New Mexico and North Dakota?

Even in states where Kerry won, the margin of victory was much less than in 2004, and I strongly believe it was due to the diligence that Karl Rove and the RNC's small army of lawyers.

For me, the sweet irony of 2004 is that Dems seem to have cut off their own fraudulent foot, I believe, by stirring up claims BEFORE the election about supposed intimidation and ballot irregularities.

57 posted on 12/14/2004 4:36:18 PM PST by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson