Pro-Democratic 'Soft Money' Groups Outpaced GOP in Presidential Race

NewsMax ^ | 12/12/04 | AP

[wagglebee]

WASHINGTON - Whatever the reasons John Kerry and the Democrats lost the race for the White House, lack of money wasn't one.

Tax-exempt pro-Democratic groups raising big checks for this year's election collected almost twice as much money as their Republican rivals in the presidential race, a study shows. The financial advantage comes in addition to record fund raising by Kerry, the unsuccessful candidate, and the Democratic Party.

In all, nonparty political groups, known as 527s because of the tax code section that covers them, raised about $534 million and spent roughly $544 million in the 2003-04 election cycle, the analysis by the nonpartisan Political Money Line campaign finance tracking service found.

The presidential race drew most of their attention. Groups supporting John Kerry or opposing President Bush raised $266 million. Those opposing Kerry or backing Bush collected $144 million, the Political Money Line said. The study was based on a review of the organizations' postelection campaign finance reports to the Internal Revenue Service.

Democratic activists began forming such groups soon after a law took effect in November 2002 that banned national party committees from collecting "soft money" - corporate or union contributions in any amount and unlimited donations from any source.

Leading Groups

Leading groups such as the Media Fund and America Coming Together, jump-started by multimillion-dollar donations from wealthy businessmen such as George Soros, focused on advertising and get-out-the-vote operations. That eased pressure on the national Democratic Party, which was prohibited from raising six- and seven-figure donations to finance such expensive activities the national Democratic Party. The outside groups' similarities in objective to party committees prompted campaign finance watchdogs to characterize them as "shadow parties."

Republicans, relying in part on their long-standing advantage over Democrats in collecting donations in modest amounts such as $10 or $20 as well as checks up to the new individual donor of $25,000 per year, initially held off on formation of their own 527 groups.

Instead, they argued that the pro-Democratic organizations violated the new law's broad ban on the use of soft money to influence federal elections. The Federal Election Commission failed to curb the groups' activities, however, and GOP activists decided last spring to forge ahead with their own outside groups.

The new Republican groups quickly raised millions from wealthy Republicans such as Texas homebuilder Bob Perry. His donations helped fund the anti-Kerry group Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, whose allegations that Kerry exaggerated his decorated Vietnam War service record monopolized attention in the campaign for weeks last summer. Their late start limited their impact on the presidential race.

The anti-Bush groups, meanwhile, had millions of dollars on hand by the time Kerry wrapped up the Democratic primaries last winter. They spent big on TV ads that kept Kerry's side on the air as he worked to rebuild his campaign fund.

In addition to the pro-Democratic outside groups' financial advantage over their pro-Bush counterparts in the presidential race, the Democratic National Committee out-raised the Republican National Committee by several million dollars during the two-year election cycle.

Although Bush raised an all-time presidential record of $273 million from private contributors, Kerry was not far behind. He collected a Democratic-record $249 million after veering from party tradition and becoming the first Democratic nominee ever to skip public financing and its spending limits during the primaries, as Bush did in 2000 and 2004.

Supporters of the soft money ban on parties have pointed to record fund raising by both sides as proof the law's limits work. Both they and critics of the law, however, are demanding that Congress keep the outside groups from pouring hundreds of millions of dollars in soft money into the next election.

[wagglebee]

It seems to me that to ensure victory in 2008, the time to start raising the money is now.

[Common Tator]

Spending on political campaigns is a bell curve. When too much money is chasing too few votes a lot of the money becomes counter productive.

Kerry and his 527s spent so much money that they ticked many independent voters off.

They also spent money foolishly. For example they hired people to register new Democrats at 10 dollars per person registered. The people hired quickly figured out they could at best register 2 or 3 people a day. So they just filled out the forms with names and addresses garnered from county directories and Phone books. When they had used all the names in the directories they just made names up. They turned in fake registrations to earn up to a thouand dollars a day. Those that stuck to real registratons could manage 2 or 3 registrations a day. The fakers were turning in a hundred fake registrations a day.

In Ohio about 230 thousand fake registrations were made. The democrats believed these fake people were going to vote. So did the exit pollsters. But the fake people with the fake made up names did not vote. So the exit polls were wrong and Bush had an easy win.

The media bought the fake exit polls. Once again the media including Fox proved they don't know what is going on or if they do know they can't tell us the truth.

That tells us a lot about the media. The kindest description of their performance is they don't know what they are doing.

[Balding_Eagle]

In Ohio about 230 thousand fake registrations were made. The democrats believed these fake people were going to vote. So did the exit pollsters. But the fake people with the fake made up names did not vote. So the exit polls were wrong and Bush had an easy win.

You predicted, long before the election, that this would happen. I was trying to believe you, I'm sure glad it turned out the way you said it would.

[river rat]

In the future --- there must be some way to punish and discourage illegal voter registration.

When the party apparatus can be shown to be involved in the "creation" of illegal voter registration, or illegal voting practices ---- 10 times the number of "illegal" registrations/votes should be deducted from their LEGAL and valid votes...

That might slow the crooked bastards down...

Semper Fi

[cfhBAMA]

THIS WILL NOT CHANGE BECAUSE WE REPUBLICANS FAVOR GIVING HARD MONEY DIRECTLY TO THE CAMPAIGNS WE SUPPORT.

[Balding_Eagle]

That is a good idea, but at this point, I'll settle for jail time, even just a month or two.

[fire_eye]

Our collective unwillingness as a nation to prosecute vote fraud when it is found, is causing the mad rush to create a National ID system and tag and register everyone like cattle.

Socialism, pure and simple- don't punish the guilty severely enough to make sure the crimes stop being committed; instead, restrict and restrain everyone equally, the guilty along with the innocent.