If your arguement is simply that of who wins and who loses and that is the end of the matter (reducio ad absurdem) and majority rules than maybe you are right. i prefer to argue from a truth that is rooted in an objective and foundational truth, namely that it is wrong to destroy an innocent human life for any reason save a serious medical threat to the woman's physical health or life, a situation that covers lesws than 1% or so of all abortions. I
I ask you, is it right to kill a human being because you want to go to law school, or to fit into a prom dress, or because your boyfriend has left you, or to save you embarrasing questions, or as Oprah Winfrey put it "that the trajectory of my life would have been different?" If you think that is acceptable than you HAVE internalized the logic of Nazi science. The unborn is an untermensch preventing the establishment of lebensraum, my personal lebensraum to allow me to live and prosper.
This does require the denial of humanity to the unborn. You cannot wantonly kill that to which you have assigned humanity. That is why your side works overtime to convince us that it is not unless Mom (or Dad if he can persuade her) wants it.
You really like to hear yourself talk, don't ya?