Yes, it is. But you did not call it "Michael Swift's homo manifesto". You called it "the homo manifesto". Do you think that the rantings of Michael Swift represent the views of ALL homosexuals?
If so, do you also think that your rantings represent the views of all on Free Republic?
Take a step back and look at your reply #144. Wipe the spittle from your chin and take it down a notch. You rave sir.
Is there any part of that which HAS NOT become part of our daily lives?
Speaking only for myself and my community...yes. None of it.
...you did not call it "Michael Swift's homo manifesto". You called it "the homo manifesto".
and the website to which I linked, a militant homo website ALSO doesn't call it "Michael Swift's manifesto" They call it "Gay manifesto" and it is a homo website, or didn't you notice?? Did I happen to mention that it is a homo website?? And the difference between "gay manifesto" and "homo manifesto" is??? did I happen to mention that this is in the congressional Record as the "gay manifesto"??? Should I have called it "gay MANY-fisto"? Do you always work this hard to obfuscate facts?
,Do you think that the rantings of Michael Swift represent the views of ALL homosexuals?
No, only the 95.8% who put this on their websites.I think that those 95.8% of you folks are making the other 4.2% look bad. The problem is that that other 4.2% sit there quietly and do nothing to decry the behavior of the other 95.8%, so you're guilty by omission and they are guilty by COmission. If that doesn't represent your community then tell me, WHY is it on so many homo websites, along with all the lies about "born that way" and "can't change", heteros "fearing" you (yeah...right!...rolls eyes...) You MUST be aware of this so you point in asking would be???
If so, do you also think that your rantings represent the views of all on Free Republic?
"Rantings"? au contraire', my little panty-clad friend, I cite facts here and provide corroborative evidence so graciously proffered up by your own kind. That is hardly a "rant". It would be if that was MY manifesto but it isn't. And you offer up? Yep, the same tired old Bull squeezings and ad hominems in lieu of substance; dicta about "ranting"; name-calling, etc. The stuff the left ALWAYS uses in lieu of cogent arguments. Do I feel I represent all of Free republic? Hmmmmm, I'm fairly sure that I never wrote that anywhere. If I did, please point it out to me. If I didn't how about laying off the red herring? Try and focus to stay on point, ok? If that was not a rhetorical (as well as foolish) question you just asked, I'd have to answer it with a "no". My facts proffered up clearly are not in accord with your thinking, but then again, I am straight.
Take a step back and look at your reply #144. Wipe the spittle from your chin and take it down a notch. You rave sir.
...and THIS is your idea of substantive dialog? Again, "au contraire'" YOU rave, my delusional friend. You have offered up nothing in this dialog which you can support with anything other than opinion. I am fully cognizant of what I write and it is readily apparent that you can't defeat my facts so you resort to the usual leftist diatribe (READ:"Drivel") How quaint! Next, this might surprise you but you are not in a position to attempt to moderate my speech. I would suspect that you're probably feeling rather empowered by what just happened in FILTHadelphia. If you find this not to your liking, read something else. The nice thing about a forum is that it has room for more than one point of view. You might be a queen but you're NOT "queen of the world". If you wish to engage me in debate, please have the deceny to make it look like something other than a turkey shoot, with you in the feathers, of course. Either offer up something of substance or go bother somebody else.
Speaking only for myself and my community...yes. None of it.
This humorous. You imply that I think I speak for all of free republic, then you delusionally think that you're qualified to speak for (your) "community", even if your opinions fly in the face of virtually every homo website out there. Feel free to prove me wrong. Just toss thos links out out here, OK? "Methinks the lady doth protesteth too much". It is that old "denial" and "delusion" thing again. I think the website to which I linked speaks more accurately of your "community" than you, my benighted friend. Oh well, you and community have refined "denial" to an artform so why am I not surprised? If you had NOT, you and your community would not exist. You' make different choices and be part of the human community at large rather than biological, spiritual and scatological dead ends. But building on your delusion, you're going to try to tell me that homosexuality is NOT taught is schools under the guise of "safety" on the planet where you live? That the laws against homosexuality have not been repealed on your planet? That laws are now on the books, as in this instant case, which PROMOTE homosexuality; all of which I just cited and quoted from the homo manifesto to illustrate same? That Homos are NOT sodomizing sons in your schools, gymnasiums, etc.? That on your planet they DON'T use rest areas, bathhouses and public bathrooms for a dating service? That your community is NOT trying to silence the "hate speech" of Christianity because it reveals you for what you are? Do I need to refer you back to your just-attempted demand that i tone my spech down for your delicate ears? Yet you say this doesn't exist in YOUR "community". Is not Philadelphia part of your world? Partner, you need a reality check because you're writing checks with your imagination that reality isn't gonna cover