Well, for one, your grammar is so terrible it is sometimes difficult to even tell what you are saying and second, it is obvious from what can be decerned you in fact do not know what you are talking about.
Good day and Good bye.
A debate as to the extent a company owns and can control the use of there property I.E. there “trade name” by other might have been of some use
Ad Hominem attack of others that disagree with your point of view is useless
As a business owner I personally think this ruling dilutes the value of a business's “trade name” and is both anti business, anti property right and typical leftist thinking
Bottom line a "trade name" is a business's property and that business should have damm near sovereign over it's use particularly when its a not a proper word but a created name. A business should be able to control it's use, with few very limited exception; and so another business can make money off another business property is not one of these limited exception no matter how minor others might think it is.
Yes on it surface this may seem silly but Google is still making money off of Geico property and may (however small) be hurting Geico business... to my thinking it's Geico property so Geico should be able to damm near what it pleased with it
(PS as my bad grammar and spelling I freely admit it... I am severely dyslexic... in business I pay people to proof my correspondence ... this I do for fun)