Indeed. Accepted facts are not always facts? One has to wonder why the Hugo Black reference is widely accepted as the "first" decision to cite the "separation" language. Thoughts?
REYNOLDS v. U.S., 98 U.S. 145 (1878)
Noted. Thanks for the point(s).
FGS
One has to wonder why the Hugo Black reference is widely accepted as the "first" decision to cite the "separation" language. Thoughts?