Posted on 12/16/2004 8:54:46 AM PST by RayChuang88
(MCNS)--Attorneys filed a federal civil rights lawsuit today against the Plano Independent School District for a discriminatory policy that censors the Christmas religious expression of students and their parents.
“The policy is a perfect example of politically correct extremism,” said Alliance Defense Fund Senior Counsel Gary McCaleb.
“School officials have gone so far as to prohibit students from wearing red and green at their ‘winter break’ parties because they claim they are Christmas colors. Even the plates and napkins must be white. The district’s policy is ludicrous to even the most common observer.”
(Excerpt) Read more at mcjonline.com ...
So I suppose all the Irish who immigrated to America came over in first class on luxury ocean liners, all the while drinking port and eating strawberries and cream? That's funny, because I thought they came over to escape famine and oppression. Silly me.
Thanks for the e-mails. I wrote to several and sent this to Hannity. Its time for WAR!
Fearing they might offend someone, Red Cross stores in Britain have taken the Christian out of Christmas this year, banning any display of overtly religious decorations.
TAKING THE KISS OUT OF CHRISTMAS
By Iain S Bruce
Are you planning a politically correct festive season? Well that’s the mistletoe out for a start ... oh, and no carol singers, or Nativity plays. In fact, maybe you should just forget about Jesus Christ as well, in case you hurt someone’s feelings
Nativity plays are banned, carol singing has been outlawed and kissing under the mistletoe is strictly off-limits: welcome to a 21st-century Christmas. If you wrap up warm, take plenty of cheer and have a good enough solicitor, you might even make it through New Year.
’Tis the week before Christmas, and all through the nation not a creature is stirring – unless you count lawyers, ambulance cha sers and the occasional non-denominational mouse. It is supposed to be the season of festive tidings and manifest delight, yet slowly but surely the joy is being sucked out of the national holiday as Nativity plays find themselves forbidden lest they cause sectarian offence, roving groups of carollers are hastily dispersed and children discover that it is no longer safe to sit on Santa’s knee.
Look at the evidence: last week the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents and the STUC joined forces to warn organisations of an increasing array of Yuletide dangers. Pointing out that employers are potentially liable for injuries inflicted after falling off office desks, food poisoning caused by a dodgy buffet and even any damages resulting when enthusiastic employees’ attempts at anatomical photography result in shattered photocopier glass and punctured posteriors, the office bash is identified as an accident waiting to happen. Their guidelines even suggested that it might be best to leave out the mistletoe due to an increased risk of sexual harassment claims.
Various shopping centres have banned carol singers on the pretext of their being a fire hazard.
The British Red Cross decided last year to ban Advent calendars from its offices.
It seems like a world gone insane … and much of the madness has been blamed on the growing power of the political correctness lobby. It should come as no surprise then, that the red-top papers have broken into a vocal campaign to save Christmas from these soulless manifestations.
Railing against the bureaucratic Scrooges hell-bent on banning light displays, carols, cards and other traditional festive pleasures, at first glance the outrage dripping from Britain’s super soaraway tab loids seems like an understandable response to what appears to be an indiscriminate attack upon our most cherished Yuletide rites. Taking care not to trample over cultural sensibilities is only right and proper, but when that leads to the emasculation of a treasured public holiday the reaction has surely gone too far.
“A politically correct agenda is seeping into the corridors of power and it has Christmas in its sights,” says sociologist Francis Black. “A movement which began as a legitimate effort to pay multiculturalism due respect is stampeding out of control, and if it keeps on running it’s only a matter of time before possession of a turkey dinner with all the trimmings becomes a criminal offence.
“Cultural sensitivity has become a bureaucratic obsession, with the fear of causing unintentional insult becoming so strong that it has driven the powers-that-be beyond the edge of reason, plunging officialdom into an apparently senseless attack upon even the most innocent traditions.”
It seems ridiculous and almost certainly is, but the pro-traditional Christmas lobby points to a feast of examples of the liberal orthodoxy’s assault upon the Yuletide customs we once held so dear. Terrified that the arcane rites of an overtly Christian festival might offend citizens ascribing to the Muslim, Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist or even Jedi creeds, councils, schools and offices nationwide are erring on the side of caution and dissociating themselves from the annual jamboree by steering clear of potentially propagandist Nativity scenes in primary schools, driving hymn-singing carollers from high streets and banning baubles from the nation’s malls. Even the evangelistic Tony Blair is playing it safe by issuing an official greetings card that omits the C word and offers only best wishes for the new year.
Irrespective of colour, creed, sexual orientation or shoe size, just about everybody likes Christmas, and most rational beings would accept that the annual displays of wooden acting and childlike choreography perpetrated by groups of five-year-olds wearing tea towels on their heads could offend only the most committed theatrical critics, while even evangelical atheists struggle to condemn the once-a-year hymn-singers lustily tramping the streets in the aid of their chosen charitable cause.
These gentle rituals represent one of our society’s few remaining cultural rallying points, and it is easy to understand why The Sun’s decision to launch its own Save Our Christmas campaign last week has been met with widespread approval.
“Say what you like about the tabloid press, but they are past masters at tuning in to the public mood,” says Black. “There is clearly a growing belief that politically correct do-gooders and mindless jobsworths are hell-bent on giving Santa the sack.”
The arguments seem so sound that at first glance the assault upon Christmas appears to be an open and shut case, but in reality the hack pack is barking up the wrong chimney. While the expanding list of Scrooge-like managerial attempts to stifle our seasonal whoopee might at first glance indicate that the tabloids have got this one spot on, closer investigation reveals that rather than being the product of PC fundamentalism, the soul-sucking clampdown is in fact a symptom of an increasingly litigious society where even the most sacred of customs can leave you exposed to civil suits, financial devastation and a humiliating appearance in court.
“There may be an element of political correctness gone wild here, but in truth the situation owes more to the increasing risk of being sued for practically everything we do,” says Stuart Neilson, an employment law and litigation specialist at legal outfit McGrigors.
“Many public bodies and businesses feel that they cannot take chances, and while 99% of people might think that objecting to a Christmas store display is ridiculous, the 1% who are prepared to take legal action represent a danger no organisation can afford to ignore.”
Take the case of John Smith (not his real name), a senior manager in the public sector. Not long ago his own department found itself accused of blinkered Scroogery after a ban on Christmas decorations in its offices, coupled with the decision not to allow the creation of a Nativity scene at one public facility, awoke outrage from clients consumed by the festive spirit. His vocal critics claimed this was a ridiculous step too far – and he completely agreed, but still believes that in the end the right decision was made.
“Nobody at the meeting wanted to ban the Nativity scene, but our hands were completely tied. We have a policy against the display of any religious objects in our premises, and, unfortunately, making an exception for Christmas could have been interpreted as an official bias towards Christianity and would certainly have left us wide open to prosecution,” he says. “It only takes one legal suit to turn that kind of situation into an expensive and time-consuming nightmare, and no matter how trivial it might have seemed we were bound by our duty to protect the public interest and avoid the risk.”
However, the Christian resonance in the festive season is a side issue for many, with the rising tide of consumerism, days off work and guilt-free partying turning it into little more than an opportunity for widespread hoo-ha, a fact bluntly illustrated when Madame Tussauds waxworks museum last week unveiled a Nativity featuring Posh and Becks.
For many it is a time of celebration, regardless of their own beliefs. “I don’t believe any Muslims living in Britain would really object to Christmas, and all the people I know love it just as much as everyone else. It’s not as if you have to embrace the whole religious message to enjoy the spirit of the season,” says Abir Mohammed, a Glaswegian student. “Saying it should stop would be like telling us not to have relatives round for Ramadan because it might offend our Christian neighbours. It’s ridiculous.”
Indeed, while the focus has been on the question of religious sensitivities, the real dangers that could lead to the quashing of Christmas are to be found in factories, shops and offices across the land. Deemed liable for events that unfold not only in their premises but also at official gatherings outside office hours, employers are exposed to a greater range of risks than ever before. Forced to consider the legal implications of every move they make, they realise that even the simplest annual rites have become a veritable minefield that has transformed the annual Christmas party from a welcome knees-up to a potential corporate disaster.
As for banning mistletoe, the STUC admits that its suggestion was a little bit tongue-in-cheek. “But that’s only because we needed to attract attention to what amounts to an extremely serious problem,” says STUC spokesman Dave Watson. “Even the most innocent blunders or badly considered jokes expose you to risk of prosecution, and while thinking about that might dampen the party atmosphere a little, it’s nothing compared with what could happen if events go wrong.”
Christmas might have sprung from firm theological roots, and a return to a more measured approach is not impossible, but today’s complex legal infrastructure means that only the brave would be prepared to even try.
“The nub of the problem here is that while the spirit of the law is all about tolerance, the letter of the law is what will be applied,” says Neilson. “It is extremely difficult to reconcile the two, and with so many grey areas and potential snares it is hardly surprising that many companies are choosing to play safe and ignore Christmas altogether.”
12 December 2004
How 'bout the cover up the windows of school buses so no student sees any indication of Christmas to-and-from school....
It is a war against Christ.
Go talk to Tony Martin about "freedom" in the UK.
My Christmas Card to the Plano ISD .....
Well, you know what us real Texans think of folks north of Huntsville.
Plano? They're damn near Okies.
Such is the way of the world. I'm not concerned about them winning the war against Christ...the outcome is assured.
I'm concerned about them winning their war on our Constitution. This is nothing short of blatant violation of the First Amendment rights of the students.
Pilgrims in an increasingly unholy land...
You're so bad. Tee hee! They sure deserve it.
haha! :^DI didn't really SEND it. But I thought about it. :^)
Did you miss this part? Not private organization, but a public one.
Take the case of John Smith (not his real name), a senior manager in the public sector. Not long ago his own department found itself accused of blinkered Scroogery after a ban on Christmas decorations in its offices, coupled with the decision not to allow the creation of a Nativity scene at one public facility, awoke outrage from clients consumed by the festive spirit. His vocal critics claimed this was a ridiculous step too far – and he completely agreed, but still believes that in the end the right decision was made.“Nobody at the meeting wanted to ban the Nativity scene, but our hands were completely tied. We have a policy against the display of any religious objects in our premises, and, unfortunately, making an exception for Christmas could have been interpreted as an official bias towards Christianity and would certainly have left us wide open to prosecution,” he says. “It only takes one legal suit to turn that kind of situation into an expensive and time-consuming nightmare, and no matter how trivial it might have seemed we were bound by our duty to protect the public interest and avoid the risk.”
Sorry - gotta call that 4-flush bluff!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
