Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: heckler
You wrote: "My objection is this- Time has proven that if you leave Congress a tool by which to manipulate the people with regards to money, they will use it. The FF's plan as you describe it leaves that ability open.

The FT treats EVERY one exactly the same."

ANSWER:

Is that so? What is the definition of income in your flat tax?

How does the founding father's direct apportioned tax among the states allow Congress to manipulate such a tax?

Fact is, taxing income is a tool of despotic governments, and used to tax by economic class via the definition of income.

Regards,

JWK

17 posted on 12/17/2004 6:24:30 AM PST by JOHN W K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: JOHN W K

Misunderstanding. By FT I was refering to the Fair Tax not the Flat Tax. The Flat Tax would be better than what we have but it still leaves to much room for manipulation.


19 posted on 12/17/2004 6:32:01 AM PST by heckler (wiskey for my men, beer for my horses, rifles for sister sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson