Isn't that 100% of women?
In context, I think the point is that women are more often "domestically" violent than men.
From a police officer I know, I believe this to be the case.
Men, however: (1) being (generally) bigger and better fighters cause more damage and (2) don't call the cops as often (although this is changing).
Yes it is, but the purpose was to seperate lesbian women and place them first, and then place heterosexual women second. This should prepare the reader for the fact that lesbian women and heterosexual women are the most violent, domestically, and in that order.
Isn't that 100% of women
Almost all, but it excludes the most violent sector of all..."cranky, asexual and anti-sexual mothers-in-law".
"Science Reveals That Lesbian & Heterosexual Women"
"Isn't that 100% of women?"
Only if you don't count my wife.
Yes, but science has confirmed the number, so now we know for certain.
I stopped reading after this pearl of wisdom was devined.....LOLOLOL
What idiots, only women in lesbian relationship...therefore only women abused.
'Isn't that 100% of women?'
- That was my thought as well. Instead of saying something to the effect that 'Science proves women are more aggressive than men', the article is designed to make an issue out of the women's sexuality.
If science could in fact prove that there are hormonal differences between straight and gay women leading to a difference in the levels of violence, it would lend credence to the argument that homosexuals are in fact victims of their chemical makeup, and that is is not simply a behavior decision. I don't know of a study which has proven it yet.
The statistics listed in this article are interesting though.
"Figures may not add to 100% because of rounding."
Cordially,
No, this thread does not include bisexual women. I have found no stat's on them...as of yet.