Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michael Jackson has 220 kids over for a Party
MSNBC ^

Posted on 12/19/2004 3:42:09 PM PST by MizzouTigerRepublican

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: reagan_fanatic

If there is such a thing, Michael appears more normal with boobs...


61 posted on 12/19/2004 4:55:42 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

LOL..we went to see that movie and I have to say that I was pretty bored for the first 20 minutes. And then...THE SOUNDS WENT OFF!!!! We sat there like idiots for five minutes and then took off, money refunded. I'm assuming the second half was better than the first!


62 posted on 12/19/2004 5:00:01 PM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Esther, do you personally meet and do background checks on all your kids teachers, friend's parents, clergymen, bicycle store operator, etc.? The fact is, you can't. No offense, but your post is stupid.


63 posted on 12/19/2004 5:02:22 PM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: pollywog
First, I'd like to say, God bless you and your husband for your caring of children in need.

And you are so right. The innocent are scrutinized beyond belief, while monsters like Jackson are above the law, it seems. I don't think this "man" will ever have to pay for his heinous crimes against children, other than maybe through his pocketbook.
64 posted on 12/19/2004 5:03:06 PM PST by LisaMalia (Merry CHRISTmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Why isn't this mutated freak, Michael Jackson, court-restrained from contact with children?!?!?

I agree. All of his history of molesting innocent boys aside, I would like to know how ANY parent who dangles their innocent baby over a balcony retains custody of said child. If someone has an answer for that one, please feel free to enlighten me.

65 posted on 12/19/2004 5:07:45 PM PST by LisaMalia (Merry CHRISTmas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative

Any parent that would let their child hang out with this freak should be charged with child neglect.


66 posted on 12/19/2004 5:11:59 PM PST by KenmcG414
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: West Coast Conservative


67 posted on 12/19/2004 5:17:23 PM PST by big bad easter bunny (Whats more to say?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Yes, of course we know very well anyone who the kids may be with. They would never be left with a stranger. Again, who in their right mind would not take the time to find out who their children are with? It does not take a lot of time or energy. Extensive background checks should always be done on anyone who works with children. You should check personal references, speak to other employers, etc., Parents should never make the careless mistake of assuming this has been done also. They MUST find out and get verification for themselves. Ask to see the actual background checks of teachers, church workers, day care workers, anyone. Maybe someone to busy shopping, working out or hanging out with their girlfriends may not have time to do this, I can under stand there busy schedule. (Not) Some are just LAZY and SELF INVOLVED and assume someone is watching the sheep when it is their job to be watching for wolves!


68 posted on 12/19/2004 5:21:12 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
And another thing, anyone who says a parent's desire to know anything and everything they possibly can find out about a stranger before they let them near one of their children is not worth one more second of time. The fact is, that kind of careless, arrogant attitude is stupid and negligent.
69 posted on 12/19/2004 5:31:09 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: al baby

Ah, the famous "Tyco Chase."


70 posted on 12/19/2004 5:32:32 PM PST by Bonaparte (Of course, it must look like an accident...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: shanscom
"Michael Jackson... understands this."

And his lawyer understands the pre-trial public relations value.

71 posted on 12/19/2004 5:36:50 PM PST by Bonaparte (Of course, it must look like an accident...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Esther Ruth

Calm down. You were the one who implied that any parent who would let someone near their children before checking them out thoroughly was not a good parent. Did you not? I was just saying that's a ridiculous comment as it is impossible to do that.


72 posted on 12/19/2004 5:42:59 PM PST by Hildy ( To work is to dance, to live is to worship, to breathe is to love.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
I didn't imply it, I stated a fact. A parent IS very much completely responsible 100% for their child's safety, it is their job to be nosy SOBs and find out if there is any dirt on the babysitter, the cub scout leader, the parents next door if your kids hangs out over there, and if some coward of a parent is to worried about stepping on toes than they shouldn't of had kids. This is what parents are suppose to do, scare the hell out of any perv who even thinks of looking cross eyes at their kids. Pervs are feeling emboldened because everyone IS acting way to calm and civilized. Calm my a$$.
73 posted on 12/19/2004 5:58:55 PM PST by Esther Ruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MizzouTigerRepublican

The children of the O.J. jury visit Jacko! (See the demographic report above.) The Man is after another one of our heroes after He (the Man, stoopid!) introduced and spread AIDS (and crack too) in our community to destroy our ancient culture which built the pyramids, bro (and ho, too)!


74 posted on 12/19/2004 6:04:28 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WestVirginiaRebel
White on black crime.

Wikipedia on "hate crime":

The US Congress (HR 4797 - 1992) defined a hate crime as: "[a crime in which] the defendant's conduct was motivated by hatred, bias, or prejudice, based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation or gender identity of another individual or group of individuals."

This wasn't a "hate crime." It was a love crime.

75 posted on 12/19/2004 6:06:59 PM PST by clyde asbury (Don't Panic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob

76 posted on 12/19/2004 7:16:59 PM PST by visualops (It's easier to build a child than repair an adult.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz

I was wondering the same thing myself


77 posted on 12/19/2004 7:23:20 PM PST by MizzouTigerRepublican (82nd ABN Gulf war vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: antiunion person

"Is this low speed chase involving a minority celebrity consistent to the other low speed chase involving an acquitted O.J. (you're damn right I cut 'em up sucka) Simpson??"

Yep! That ex-football player, aka The Butcher of Brentwood.


78 posted on 12/19/2004 7:36:22 PM PST by Baraonda (Demographic is destiny. Don't hire 3rd world illegal aliens nor support businesses that hire them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: shanscom

I have never even liked his music. I have never understood the fascination by the American public with this pedophile.


79 posted on 12/20/2004 7:46:34 AM PST by MizzouTigerRepublican (82nd ABN Gulf war vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: al baby

http://armandfrasco.typepad.com/main/michael_jackson_on_the_runxx.jpg


This picture is killing me!


80 posted on 12/20/2004 11:06:45 AM PST by MizzouTigerRepublican (82nd ABN Gulf war vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson