Skip to comments.
Eskimo Filing Against US Just Tip of Legal Iceberg
CNSNews ^
| December 17
| Marc Morano
Posted on 12/19/2004 4:00:21 PM PST by MissouriConservative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Good grief. Typical leftists...hypocracy, turning to the courts to get what they want, yada, yada, yada. It is fun, though, to watch them squirm like rabid worms.
To: MissouriConservative
"History -- and even recent history -- shows us that nations go to war over less. Now, fortunately, this is not how we are as Inuits; we are peaceful people,"
Go ahead, make our day!
2
posted on
12/19/2004 4:06:02 PM PST
by
Citizen James
(Well done is better than well said - Benjamin Franklin)
To: Citizen James
Let them try to sue China; a real polluter.
3
posted on
12/19/2004 4:06:51 PM PST
by
aviator
(Armored Pest Control)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: MissouriConservative
Great! Let them "prove" it in a court of law!
5
posted on
12/19/2004 4:07:42 PM PST
by
DTogo
(U.S. out of the U.N. & U.N out of the U.S.)
To: MissouriConservative
Kinda hope they do prove that we're responsible for warming them up. We can send 'em a heat bill once a month.
To: MissouriConservative
Corell included the use of modern snowmobiles as part of a "subsistence" lifestyle.Yup, they must have the snowmobiles that don't emit any greenhouse gasses. You know, the clean-burning kind. Yup, right.
I have always marveled at the Inuit people's history and customs, and I mean them no disrespect. But they are being shamelessly used by the Greenpeaceniks.
7
posted on
12/19/2004 4:08:56 PM PST
by
Semper911
(Those who wait also serve.)
To: MissouriConservative; Rennes Templar
Must...kill...headline...writer...for...awful...pun...
8
posted on
12/19/2004 4:09:49 PM PST
by
LibertarianInExile
(NO BLOOD FOR CHOCOLATE! Get the UN-ignoring, unilateralist Frogs out of Ivory Coast!)
To: DTogo
My favorite part is where, when confronted by a legitimate question about science, the greenie dismissed the question as "silly" and then shut down the questions.
How can a question concerning science that goes against their theories be silly? Sounds like, to me, that they know that their science is pure bunk and they are simply looking to tell other people how to live and maybe make a buck or three doing it.
9
posted on
12/19/2004 4:10:37 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul)
To: MissouriConservative
The former USSR is a lot closer to Alaska than the lower 48 and they are bigger polluters by a factor of several thousand. Oops, this is about getting money by embracing the global warming hoax, not pollution.
To: DTogo
Let them "prove" it in a court of law! There are some U.S. courts that would be anxious to help them "prove" it. Not to mention the many favorable venues this case would find internationally...
11
posted on
12/19/2004 4:11:29 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
To: okie01
I have no doubt that a California court would love to rule against the federal government...heck even the 9th Circuit Court...but it would struck down, again, by the Supreme Court.
12
posted on
12/19/2004 4:14:41 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul)
To: MissouriConservative
To: F15Eagle
"can we offer them a case of Eskimo Pies to settle?"
I was thinking more like Klondike Bars instead.
14
posted on
12/19/2004 4:15:56 PM PST
by
MissouriConservative
(A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul)
Comment #15 Removed by Moderator
To: aviator
"Let them try to sue China; a real polluter. And India.
And Clinton for good measure...for locking up those huge supplies LOW-SULPHER coal deposits in Utah...(and helping his buddy Riady)
16
posted on
12/19/2004 4:19:48 PM PST
by
spokeshave
(Strategery + Schardenfreude = Stratenschardenfreudery)
To: MissouriConservative
Tell them to go sue China and see how far they get first....
Ingrate Inuits
imo
17
posted on
12/19/2004 4:20:34 PM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: MissouriConservative
It will be a cold day in hell before this gains anything.
18
posted on
12/19/2004 4:21:45 PM PST
by
Waywardson
(Carry on! Nothing equals the splendor!)
To: MissouriConservative
Naturally a few billion US dollars will make them and their inviron-mental lawyers go away...
Hard to believe at least one of RFKs sons isnt hanging his hat on this one....sounds just like one of their greenie scams..
imo
19
posted on
12/19/2004 4:23:11 PM PST
by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: MissouriConservative
...but it would struck down, again, by the Supreme Court. Having gotten more attention than it deserved. And earned lawyers more outrageous fees.
Both of which tend to encourage future challenges...
20
posted on
12/19/2004 4:29:54 PM PST
by
okie01
(The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson