Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi Subcontractors
washingtonpost.com ^ | Monday, December 20, 2004 | wapo

Posted on 12/20/2004 7:32:31 AM PST by crushelits

THE FACTS surrounding Ahmed Abu Ali's detention and possible torture in Saudi Arabia remain shrouded in diplomatic and law enforcement secrecy. Caution, therefore, is certainly in order in assessing the U.S. government's role in the arrest a year and a half ago of this American citizen and in his detention without charge or access to counsel ever since.

But as U.S. District Judge John D. Bates put it last week in a compelling opinion on the case, Mr. Abu Ali's lawyers "have not only alleged, but have presented some unrebutted evidence, that [his] detention is at the behest and ongoing direction of United States officials." This evidence, Judge Bates wrote, is "considerable" though "of varying degrees of competence and persuasiveness." And he rejected the government's motion to dismiss the case, deciding that he needs to know more about the circumstances of Mr. Abu Ali's detention before concluding that the detention of an American by Saudi authorities is beyond the purview of U.S. courts.

Mr. Abu Ali was arrested in June 2003 while taking a final exam at a Saudi university. Around that time, three other Americans were detained as part of the same investigation. The others were extradited and charged here in connection with the operation of the alleged jihadist cell in Virginia that trained for terrorism using paintball. But Mr. Abu Ali was not extradited, though the FBI has suggested that he admitted in his Saudi interrogation seeking to form an al Qaeda cell. He and his parents claim there was no case to make against him, so American authorities -- instead of putting diplomatic pressure on the Saudis to release him -- have encouraged Saudi authorities to let him rot.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abu; ahmed; ali; detention; saudi; saudiarabia; subcontractors

1 posted on 12/20/2004 7:32:35 AM PST by crushelits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: crushelits
I don't remember the courts being so solicitous off dual nationals being detained by their own government abroad.

The US involvement is irrelevant since, as a Saudi citizen, he is subject to Saudi law. And if that allows indefinite detentions without trial, tough.

2 posted on 12/20/2004 7:43:56 AM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

"have encouraged Saudi authorities to let him rot."

Sounds good to me.


3 posted on 12/20/2004 8:27:42 AM PST by Max Combined (Clinton is "the notorious Oval Office onanist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

This must the first time anyone has complained about the U.S. not seeking extradition of a criminal terrorist.

Even an activist judge is going to find it very hard to make the government seek extradition. It seems as if their only resort is to sue the Saudis for false imprisonment. Lots of luck.


4 posted on 12/20/2004 9:00:19 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson