Posted on 12/21/2004, 3:26:55 AM by Tumbleweed_Connection
Congressional Democrats are wandering the Yellow Brick Road, trying to work their lion's woof into a roar as they vow to confront the Republicans' dominance of government with some "put up yer dukes" ferocity. In the Senate, where most of their dwindling power resides in the limited form of a filibuster threat, the Democrats plan to dust off their policy committee as a vehicle to hold their own oversight hearings. They hope to investigate administration programs and hear from whistle-blowers. They lack the subpoena power the G.O.P. majority can bring to bear on witnesses and issues, but the Democrats are promising to muckrake the status quo the way the Republicans are not.
Taxpayers can only wish them well. But if the senators are serious, they might take a lesson from down the hall in the other chamber, where Congressman Henry Waxman, a California Democrat, has made pestering from the minority side of the aisle an art form for the past 10 years.
Mr. Waxman regularly attracts attention with early warning inquiries into such subjects as the Enron scandal, the State Department's erroneous claim of terrorism's decline and corporate-contract boondoggles in Iraq. His latest project may be too bold for the Democrats who are worried by the supposed power of the moral values lobby, but Mr. Waxman has surveyed the Bush administration's financing of abstinence-only programs and found a laundry list of sexual nonsense being purveyed to teenagers: that genital touching can result in pregnancy, that abortion can lead to sterility and suicide, and that 50 percent of gay teenage boys test positive for the AIDS virus.
With $170 million budgeted for abstinence-only programs, the congressman is attracting deserved attention with the findings - rooted out by his staff - that 11 of the 13 most commonly used curriculums offer teenagers false and distorted information about the effectiveness of contraceptives and the risks of abortion, confuse religion and science, and promote the stereotyping of boys and girls. Comprehensive sex education programs have been shown to decrease pregnancies and sexually transmitted diseases among teenagers, Mr. Waxman notes, while graduates of abstinence-only programs tend to make less-informed decisions in their first sexual ventures.
The lesson for the Capitol's frustrated Democratic minority is more about politics than sex. Put some effort into galvanizing curiosity about what's actually going on in government. Mr. Waxman's value as a lone-wolf pest was clear when the Senate majority leader Bill Frist, a Republican, had to concede grudgingly that abstinence-only spending deserved further investigation.
Check the lead sentence...
Check the plastic surgery newsgroups: Waxman has been posting inquiries regarding the feasibility and cost of nostril reduction surgery. That's a much better use of his time and energies.
'follow the yellow brick road'.....
Thanks Okie.
My pings didn't post (again). Ping.
All these "nonsense" charges and not a single footnote/citation/reference.
I'll bet good money that no abstinence program teaches that "genital touching" causes pregnancy.
You did miss something to this post.
Did you see the lead sentence about 'yellow brick road'?
The song, 'Goodby yellow brick road' Was sent out 2 days ago on the left message network.
That is a hidden message.
The full meaning? We don't know, we aren't part of their network.
But if you use google, you will see alot of links to private forums.
Just like Elton John's other song, "Rocket Man", which-if you listen carefully to the lyrics-quickly turns into a thinly-veiled homage paid to a closeted gay man.
What is the innuendo in Yellow Brick Road?
Not doubting you. If you are right, I would feel alot better. I am focused on the plane reference in the lyrics.
How do you interpret it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.