Skip to comments.
Parting Company Is An Option
Walter E. Williams, George Mason University ^
| February 26, 2004
| Walter E. Williams
Posted on 12/21/2004 7:01:52 AM PST by cougar_mccxxi
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: cougar_mccxxi
If you read the writings of the anti-federalists, most of their complaints and predictions about the Constitution and how it threatened state sovereignty have come to fruition.
2
posted on
12/21/2004 7:06:42 AM PST
by
SAR
To: cougar_mccxxi
3
posted on
12/21/2004 7:09:14 AM PST
by
cvq3842
To: cougar_mccxxi
I sure like Walter E. Williams. If the states voluntarily came together, then there is no reason why they cannot voluntarily withdraw.
To: stainlessbanner
5
posted on
12/21/2004 7:11:09 AM PST
by
TomServo
("Pretend you’re a Picasso! Move your nose to the back of your head!")
To: SAR
10th Ammendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
I don't think it can be much clearer.
Our "representatives" have serially violated our laws.
Most of the government agencies are illegal: NEA, Social Security, Income Tax (should never have been put in the Constitution), HUD, HHS, most of them except Defence and Commerce are illegal.
We need to get our country back.
6
posted on
12/21/2004 7:11:35 AM PST
by
shubi
(Peace through superior firepower.)
To: cougar_mccxxi
7
posted on
12/21/2004 8:09:00 AM PST
by
VRW Conspirator
(Respect your authorities...if you have any - Mark Twain)
To: cougar_mccxxi
Federal, state, local, and FICA taxes; upwards of 40% of your income.
Gas, cigarette, sales and consumption taxes; you know the story.
Work permits, building permits, drivers license, compulsory insurance; it goes on and on.
Getting the federal, state and local governments out of our pockets and off our backs? Priceless :)
To: cougar_mccxxi
One wonders whether the brutality witnessed in 1861 would be repeated if New Hampshire seceded - massive troops along with today's deadly modern military equipment and Americans killing Americans. If probably would if New Hampshire shelled U.S. troops in a U.S. facility on her way out.
9
posted on
12/21/2004 8:26:16 AM PST
by
Non-Sequitur
(Jefferson Davis - the first 'selected, not elected' president.)
To: nolu chan; sionnsar; Free Trapper; dcwusmc; Wampus SC; Fiddlstix; Southron Patriot; ...
To: TomServo
To: Non-Sequitur
That would be a certainty. It would no doubt also be a certainty, shot or no, with a Clinton as president.
12
posted on
12/21/2004 8:54:05 AM PST
by
sionnsar
(† trad-anglican.faithweb.com † || Iran Azadi || http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1304997/posts)
To: stainlessbanner
Hey stainless~
Thanks for the ping . . .
Through a peaceful political process they hope to assume leadership in the state's legislature and executive offices and reduce burdensome taxation and regulation, reform state and local law, end federal mandates that violate the Ninth and Tenth Amendments . . .
Couldn't help but think that this is what has taken place in the "solid South" since '68. It's gone from all blue to all red? Of course none of that was due to "imports" but rather good 'ol boys in pick-ups with Rebel flags on the window. ;^)
13
posted on
12/21/2004 9:50:12 AM PST
by
w_over_w
(Where do forest rangers go to "get away from it all?")
To: cougar_mccxxi
14
posted on
12/21/2004 12:06:05 PM PST
by
Pagey
(Hillary talking about the bible,is as hypocritical as Bill carrying one out of church for 8 years)
To: TomServo
Glad to see you back at the keyboard.
15
posted on
12/21/2004 12:20:24 PM PST
by
PeaRidge
("Walt got the boot? I didn't know. When/why did it happen?" Ditto 7-22-04 And now they got #3fan.)
To: TomServo
Glad to see you back at the keyboard.
16
posted on
12/21/2004 12:22:38 PM PST
by
PeaRidge
("Walt got the boot? I didn't know. When/why did it happen?" Ditto 7-22-04 And now they got #3fan.)
To: stainlessbanner
Excellent article my friend! Its too bad so many damnYankees didn't recognize that intent of the Founders. I see Non-Sequential is up to his old buffonish charges. Please explain to me how a US Fortification on Southern soil in 1861, with no treaty recognizing it by the Confederate Government
AS AN AUTHORIZED FOREIGN MILITARY FORTIFICATION was legally exempted from being fired upon?
But then Lincoln would use any port in a storm to promote war. And the Yankees had the temerity to call us ignorant!
17
posted on
12/21/2004 8:00:58 PM PST
by
Colt .45
(Navy Veteran - Pride in my Southern Ancestry! Chance favors the prepared mind.)
To: stainlessbanner
Thanks for the Ping. Dr. Williams is great. I love it when he does his radio show. Wish he'd stop letting that Limbaugh fellow guest host so much!
18
posted on
12/21/2004 8:36:56 PM PST
by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
To: Non-Sequitur
Just clarification here:
When South Carlina seceded in December of 1860, all (previously) federal properties within her borders returned to the State.
Fort Sumter was OUR property, NOT federal property. It was within OUR territorial waters according to all international law.
For the tyrant Lincoln to reject Confederate peace emmissaries, then notify them that he would reinforce the troops was an act of war.
We drove the invaders out.
The tyrant Lincoln wanted a war, and he got a war.
To: cougar_mccxxi
Walter Williams is simply the best! A true 'black Confederate', and one of my heros!!!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson