"You know, I know nothing more about the class performance on tests than you do. However, we do know that one child was hesitant to speak to him about receiving help because of him using religion frequently."
But that lack of evidence of a negative impact is material, that he spoke for up to 10 minutes is not. He could just as easily ahve spoken on football.
It is clearly the fact that he spoke on religion in a positive way that instigated the complaints against him nothing else. Not student performance, nothing else but that he shared his faith.
And that Christians go along with this persecution is really incredible.
Uh, cornering students in the hallway and instigating unwelcome prayer sessions? But we know that you have lied about this from the beginning so I don't expect you to own up now.
Just like when you argued that he was answering a student's question, you are making facts up out of thin air. Nowhere in the article does it say that he only spoke about religion for 10 minutes.
Assume the fact are as the paper reported. I know that may not always be the case, but that is all you and I have to go on. And until I have information that contradicts that, either from another media source or, at least, from someone in that community that knows more about the situation than we do, I am going to base my thoughts on the facts at hand.
There are thousands of scenarios that could be made up to support either one of our sides. But the fact is, we only know what is reported in this article.