Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/22/2004 8:10:03 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Unam Sanctam

Rest of article:

Reid's reputation as an opponent of abortion rests partly on votes in 1999 and 2003 against the Harkin amendment, which endorsed Roe v. Wade. Today, Reid is the only remaining Democratic senator who voted no both times. He also voted for a ban on partial-birth abortion and for a bill making the killer of a pregnant woman guilty of two murders--one for the woman's life and one for the unborn child's. Those votes bolster Reid's pro-life credentials.

But there's more to the story. The Harkin resolution was merely an expression of Senate sentiment. It wasn't binding. On partial-birth abortion, Reid voted initially for a substitute bill that would have gutted the ban. And on the two-victims legislation, he demonstrably backed a measure proposed by Senator Dianne Feinstein of California that would have done just the opposite, codified that only one victim was involved. Reid and then-Senate Democratic leader Tom Daschle ostentatiously cast the first two votes for the Feinstein bill. It lost by one vote.

After President Bush reinstated the so-called Mexico City policy which bars funds from overseas organizations that perform or promote abortions, Reid moved to block the president's action. His amendment was never enacted. Reid also supported attempts to revive American funds for the United Nations Population Fund, some of whose money aids coercive abortions in China. These attempts to stymie the pro-life efforts failed. So what's the bottom line on Reid as a reliable legislative battler on behalf of the unborn? He's not one.

Finally, there's the matter of Reid's allies

and opponents on abortion. Klein quotes Kate Michelman, the former head of NARAL Pro-Choice America, as saying of Reid, "I'm honored to be his friend." When Reid ran for Democratic leader, neither NARAL nor Planned Parenthood voiced a peep of opposition. And WeNews, an online publication for women, concluded Reid's ascension wouldn't affect the strong pro-abortion position of Senate Democrats. Meanwhile, Douglas Johnson, the chief lobbyist for National Right to Life, said Reid "is certainly no ally of the pro-life movement. He usually votes against pro-life interests when it matters most." Thus, Reid turns out to be, again, closer to the pro-abortion side than the pro-life.

In 1985, when Reid was a House member, he published a newspaper ad citing ten antiabortion votes he'd made. Better yet, the ad included an endorsement by Republican Rep. Henry Hyde of Illinois, the leading pro-life spokesman on Capitol Hill. Reid, Hyde said, "has never failed to support . . . the issues that concern the family and the pre-born." A decade later, Reid had found wiggle room on abortion. He'd come up with a different take.

Voters in Reid's home state approved a referendum in 1990 making Roe v. Wade the law in Nevada. "I respect that decision and believe it should only be changed by another vote of the people of Nevada," Reid wrote constituents a few years later. "I will review all proposed abortion legislation with this perspective." And so he has. A real pro-lifer wouldn't have.


2 posted on 12/22/2004 8:11:00 AM PST by Unam Sanctam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam

Democrats are very good at pretending to be what they are not. Remember that Kerry was opposed to abortion.


3 posted on 12/22/2004 8:15:45 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
Harry is a major leader of the abortion party. Harry is a politician. Harry lies through his teeth and disdains the Nevada voters by holding opposite positions in order to get 'all the votes he can' without exhibiting a shred of character other than the typical democrat offering, lip service. Is Harry Reid anti-abortion? ... Absolutely not. Is Harry Reid pro-life? ... not at all, but he works hard to pretend such and shills like Russert do all they can to help him fool the people.
6 posted on 12/22/2004 8:24:34 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
Third, do pro-life forces see the person as an ally or do pro-abortion lobbyists look kindly on the person?

Not always a good indication. There was a case a couple of years ago of a vote on somatic cell nuclear transplantation that came up in the Kentucky legislature. National Right to Life said that a "yes" vote was not in direct opposition to their standards. Kentucky Right to Life, however, decided that a "yes" vote was a bad vote.

Several Republican legislators that, under any other circumstance could never be considered pro-choice, voted for the bill. The Kentucky Right to Life went after some of them unmercifully the next year, despite the fact that these legislators had always been staunch supporters of the Kentucky Right to Life's initiatives.

Pro-life citizen lobbyists . . . not always the sanest group.

7 posted on 12/22/2004 8:24:40 AM PST by Bluegrass Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
The answer to the question of whether Reid is "pro-life" is easy to determine. When the president nominates a federal judge or justice who is very well qualified, but who is "pro-life", what will Reid do? If he supports a filibuster (I am assuming that the Republican majority will not take, or will not be able to take, action to limit or declare the use of a filibuster unconstitutional in the case of a judicial nomination) solely because the nominee is "pro-life", he is NOT "pro-life".
10 posted on 12/22/2004 8:28:57 AM PST by Pharlap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam

I know you shouldn't judge someone by the way they look, but Reid has those little, squinty, piggy eyes, and I wouldn't trust him or anything he says. Typical dem-lib-socialist.


11 posted on 12/22/2004 8:36:55 AM PST by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam

Harry Reid is a useful fool. Every time I have met and talked with him, he has to ask his aid what his position is on that subject. He is just a puppet on DemocRat strings.


12 posted on 12/22/2004 8:51:17 AM PST by ORECON (Condi Rice/Ann Coulter - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
And he made a case for working "toward reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies, unintended pregnancies. . . . That would, of course, lead to fewer abortions. That should be a goal we all have."

Sounds like Clinton when he claimed he longed for a day when abortion was "safe, legal and rare".

13 posted on 12/22/2004 9:10:48 AM PST by Constitutionalist Conservative (Have you visited http://blog.c-pol.com?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam

Who said he was?


14 posted on 12/22/2004 9:11:59 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam

Reid is a sick man if he chooses Barbara Boxer to be as close to him as a sister.....PITIFUL.....small brained lefty....Reid is so limp-wristed maybe Boxer beats up his enemies for him.


15 posted on 12/22/2004 9:14:27 AM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam
Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid is "pro-life."

The bolded words are mutually exclusive. All democrats are pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, and anti-Christian. They are the domestic enemies of the Constitution

16 posted on 12/22/2004 10:39:11 AM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Unam Sanctam

bttt


18 posted on 12/22/2004 2:43:04 PM PST by swilhelm73 (Dowd wrote that Kerry was defeated by a "jihad" of Christians...Finally – a jihad liberals oppose!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson