Posted on 12/24/2004 11:19:51 PM PST by neverdem
I know of a case where a woman gave her estranged husband's guns to her foreign boyfriend (ILLEGALY thus!). He was threatened by him and what not. Called ATF/DOJ, they did nothing.
Gun confiscation laws are selectively applied against the white male the gov fears and the radical leftists hate and wish to kill freely and "pogromize".
Oh yea when the TPO goes into effect you generally CANNOT take your guns from the residence - only clothes, depends on the cop at the scene.It is a bad situation.
Guys I work with get stuck in it all the time. Just last week a kid got locked up overnight, missed work and the rest of his life cause he picked up some psycho b@tch at a bar , went to her house, she wigged out and threw a phone at the wall, neighbor called 911 - he claim he never touched her - I believe him. Court in 45 days and TPO in effect. He's is just lucky he was at her place.
NYTexan wrote:Not exactly. In Gwinnett County Georgia, every divorce proceeding results in two restraining orders, one "protective order" for each party in the divorce. It's issued summarily to everyone who files for divorce. If you live in Gwinnett County Georgia and you get a divorce, both you and your former spouse forever lose your 2nd amendment rights.
Under most circumstances a person has to to have reasonable cause for a restraining order.
"the Woburn police went to the man's house and confiscated his guns, all 13 of them"
And of course the police dutifully gave possession of them to the woman being protected by nothing but a piece of legal paper, right? They didn't? Oh.
/sarcasm off
"If you live in Gwinnett County Georgia and you get a divorce, both you and your former spouse forever lose your 2nd amendment rights."
And you voters are TAKING THAT from your public servants?!?
Now the question is, if I cannot personally deny you a natural right, can I delegate authority I don't have to my "substitutes and agents" in government? The answer is NO. Does a bunch of lawyers dancing around a fire shaking chicken bones and screaming "compelling state interest" change that? NO. Americans have forgotten the concept of principal and agent.
If you can't personally make a fundamental, natural right enjoyed by your next door neighbor illegal with his compliance enforced at the point of your gun (require a license., i.e., permission to do that which would otherwise be illegal), neither can your substitute & agent in government. How many other natural rights are now illegal?
Dude, it happened to me during my divorce. In Hilliard.
agreed, I have seen degrees petitioned on little more than spite.
I find it very disturbing that the police can now sieze personal property without a court order or compensation. In addition the owner is not even given a chance to place the property with other relatives.
You're wrong. TRO's are now standard "boiler plate" offered by divorce lawyers to increase the leverage on husbands. Just a standard twist of the legal screws. No proof needed at all, just her word.
Whats not written here is also key....had all 13 not been there he'd have been arrested......
Glad to see you back old friend.
L
I got them to my brothers house the next day.
Then over the next 6 days I filed an Emergency Motion to appeal the TRO and gave the judge 6 pages of documentary evidence that my wife had perjured herself and demanded that he refer the case for prosecution.
The judges response was 'no harm, no foul' and then he vacated the order.
No harm my ass. It cost me an extra grand to get the damned thing vacated.
L
I think a lot of folks screwed by TROs would say a grand was cheap. Glad to hear it worked out for you, I wish there was "boiler plate" you could generate and post with a "how to beat a lying b!+c#'s lying TRO" guide. Sounds like you did it the best way, hard and fast.
So even if he had already put some of his weapons "off site," they'd take him in for violating his TRO?
Does a TRO like this ever expire, say after divorce, or if the husband moves out of state?
Does a no-guns RO mean he's just plain screwed forever, RKBA-wise?
IMHO and limited knowledge of each states laws I'd say in this situation ........yes on all counts. The FOIC thang that some states have adopted make you responsible for a firearm and it's security until ya get it officially removed from your FOIC (Firearms Owners ID Card). They do a random check or this TRO RO thang on ya at Oh Early Thirthy the old "it was stolen" won't fly and ya get room and board at the grey bar inn till ya fess up.....incrementalism is still upon us and it's almost time for frogs legs.
You would lose your guns until the hearing--probably several months away. Even if the order is vacated during the hearing, what are your chances of getting your guns back?
This can happen to anyone....
Due process apparently doesn't exist in some blue states...
God bless everyone.
They are listening right now to all of us here..bastards..and they can kiss my ass. I am raising my spawn to carry on the fight. And to think we waste resources and liberties over this shite while the Islamists are at our throats and our culture is eroded by la migra 24-7. We are governed by the weak...at least in Massachusetts.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.